Object

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 9421

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Rev Paul Hamilton

Representation Summary:

No. No brownfield here. Many elsewhere.

Full text:

Q1: I strongly disagree with these proposals.

Q2: No. New houses needed but not this many.

Q3: Yes, not on Green Belt.

Q4: Warley, near Holly Trees.

Q5: Yes.

Q6: Brownfield only.

Q7: No.

Q8: No.

Q9: No. No brownfield here. Many elsewhere.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 5
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Q12: Drainage.

Q13: Roads. Maintaining housing, farmland, forests/trees.

Attachments: