Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 9331
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr John McCready
No - This whole programme should have been rejected. We have an MP who is a member of the government, what is his part in this?
Q1: The idea of constant growth is ridiculous, villages are being turned into towns! This is a national problem not a local, in the north of England derelict houses are being pulled down.
Q2: Yes - By all means consider the issues, providing that the answer in Q1 is considered.
Q3: As one who is opposed to the envisaged growth there seems to be little point in commenting on any individual site.
Q4: None. The A127 is developing into a built up corridor from London to Southend.
Q5: No - The previous answers deal with this.
Q6: No, no, no.
Q7: No - Turn the disused office blocks into factories.
Q8: Yes - But no more supermarkets.
Q9: Yes - Instead of farmland being sold to developers, use it for leisure.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Nature Reserves/Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded/Derelict/Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 4
Leisure/Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: No - This whole programme should have been rejected. We have an MP who is a member of the government, what is his part in this?
Q13: The previous answers deal with this.
For a consultation process this must be seen as a disgrace. While there has been talk of growth - only today (16/02/2015) have we seen consultation documents. It has to be asked just who has been consulted.