Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 9270
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Pamela Greenshields
Houses: 4
Commercial/Industrial buildings: 1
Nature Reserves/Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded/Derelict/Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/Recreation Facilities: 3
Q1: Yes - As long as brownfield is first option and greenfield encroachment is kept to a minimum.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Yes - Minimise urban sprawl.
Q4: A127 growth corridor impacts on traffic flow on A128 between A127 and Brentwood which is already beyond capacity at peak times.
Q5: Yes.
Q6: Only develop existing brownfield sites.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 4
Commercial/Industrial buildings: 1
Nature Reserves/Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded/Derelict/Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes - Existing traffic over capacity of A128 between A127 and Brentwood.