Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8875
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Derek Agombar
Yes - Over developed in south, West Horndon should not be doubled or trebled in size (Education, health, transport, flood risk not fully assessed!)
Q1: Yes - There are three areas north, centre, south.
Q2: No - South A127 corridor over used, C2C trains packed rush hour. Building on Green Belt that has historic flooding poor idea. No development of Shenfield area making use of Crossrail.
Q3: Yes - Development on brownfield site at West Horndon only. This alone will have major effect on village (infrastructure issues). No development on Green Belt, historic flood risk not fully appreciated.
Q4: I don't agree A127 has greater growth capacity, (other borough developments not considered in A127 capacity). Dunton Garden makes more sense than rest of proposals.
Q5: Yes - Park and ride to Crossrail hub has great potential.
Q6: Brownfield sites should be used first, i.e. Wash Road. Near Crossrail major hub. M25 Industrial site poor choice, road use only. No public transport.
Q7: Yes - Public transport must be accessible. Road use alone (poor idea).
Q8: Yes - Public transport to centre a must. A busy High Street a must for local and visitors to borough.
Q9: Yes - West Horndon Park could be better developed.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 3
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 2
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial Buildings: 3
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 2
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 2
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes - Over developed in south, West Horndon should not be doubled or trebled in size (Education, health, transport, flood risk not fully assessed!)
Q13: Public transport. Over reliant on roads.