Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 8593

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Jonathan Hewitt

Representation Summary:

Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Full text:

Q1: No. I object to any proposals to build on current Green Belt.

Q2: No.

Q3: Yes. Brownbelt sites are appropriate as long as they are for local need.

Q4: The A127 has no capacity for growth.

Q5: Yes, as long as it is not on Green Belt. I object to building on Green Belt.

Q6: This is not for local need, this is national need.

Q7: No.

Q8: Yes.

Q9: Yes.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 4

Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 1
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: No.

Q13: Doctors, schools, playschools.

Attachments: