Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8269
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Peter Snelling
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 4
Community atmosphere: 4
Q1: Yes.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Yes - Green Belt land must be protected for once it is 'gone' it is never going to be reinstated for future generations. Implications for wildlife, quality of atmosphere, social cohesion.
Q4: Dunton.
Q5: Yes - But limited to prevent urban sprawl and reliance on one transport link which is already overloaded (A12).
Q6: Only develop brownfield sites despite objections from developers who 'moan' about its additional expense. Use smaller building firms (pref. local)
Q7: Yes
Q8: Yes
Q9: Yes - Open space = preserving the Green Belt.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty/ Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 3
Commercial/ Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/ Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 4
Community atmosphere: 4
Q12: North Brentwood's tendency to flood - the drainage / sewage question should be considered.
Q13: Free car parking for centres / retail regeneration. Faster more frequent bus services to relieve road congestion.