Object
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8174
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Ms Elizabeth Rouse
Yes - as long as parking needs are catered for. It's unrealistic to assume public transport is sufficient. [Shenfield].
Q1: Yes.
Q2: Yes.
Q3: Infrastructure in north of borough suggests expansion there should be minimal.
Q4: Yes, but not exclusively. Those living in the south of borough should not face all expansion. Infrastructure here limited too.
Q5: Yes. The site at Mountnessing roundabout [site ref: 107] has been abandoned for a long time.
Q6: Brownfield sites first.
Q7: Yes.
Q8: Yes - as long as parking needs are catered for. It's unrealistic to assume public transport is sufficient.
Q9: No.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 4
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 4
Historic Interest: 3
Tranquility: 3
Q11: Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 3
Woodland: 3
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Yes.
Q13: Roads to reduce traffic jams in Brentwood and Shenfield town centres at peak times - if those sites are selected for new homes.