Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 6965

Received: 10/02/2015

Respondent: Mr Michael Moss

Representation Summary:

Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 4
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2

Full text:

I have tried to find the necessary questionnaire about the above mentioned subject but have been unable to access it. I wish to object most strongly to the proposals for a number of reasons, not least of which is that neither Lime Grove nor Peartree Lane are suitable for increased vehicular traffic either during or post development. This is a ridiculous proposal obviously put forward by and supported by those who have either no knowledge of the area or selfish interests or both. I wish to register my objections.

[Email: See attached]

Attachments: