Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 5767
Received: 16/02/2015
Respondent: Michelle Jones
Houses: 4
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 2
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land : 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 2
Q1: Do you agree with the broad areas, for the purpose of considering approaches to growth?
Yes
No X
Comments
?
Q2: Do you agree with the issues raised within each of these areas?
Yes
No X
Comments
?
Q3: Do you have any comments on the appropriateness of particular sites?
Yes X
No
Comments
Sites 209, 043,080,188 are not appropriate for development sites - there are already significant safety issues with the crossroads adjacent to these proposed development areas and an increase in vehicular movements would only prove to exacerbate the problem. The sites are very rural and there is no connectivity in terms of cycle routes or pedestrian routes to the neighbouring village, so residents are more likely to use conventional forms of transport because of distance and safety issues. Site 209 is also open fields at the moment and development of these would have both a detrimental effect in terms of environmental impact on the area and views for the neighbouring properties.
?
Q4: Given the greater capacity for growth along the A127 corridor, which of the sites put forward do you think is the best location for growth?
Comments
?
Q5: Should the A12 corridor accommodate growth by releasing sites on the edge of urban areas?
Yes X
No
Comments
This would be more appropriate than the rural areas depending on improvements to local infrastructure and connectivity to arterial routes and M25 junctions
?
Q6: In order to provide for local need is it preferable for Greenfield sites on the edge of villages to be released, or to develop brownfield sites (both within the Green Belt)?
Comments
Development of brownfield sites
?
Q7: To enable future employment need to be met do you agree that the most sustainable approach is to allocate new sites close to the strategic highway network?
Yes X
No
Comments
For the purpose of transport and commuting.
?
Q8: In order to ensure that the Town Centre remains economically sustainable, do you agree that a "Town Centre First" approach should be taken to retail development?
Yes X
No
Comments
?
Q9: Are there opportunities for more open space provision in the area where you live?
Yes
No X
Comments
NO
?
Q10: Please rate the level to which you value the landscape near where you live (on a scale of 1 to 5), as compared to other areas within Brentwood Borough, for the following aspects:
Aspect: Very Low Low Average High Very High
Scenic Beauty / Attractivness 1 2 3 4 5X
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use 1 2 3 4 5X
Wildlife Interest 1 2 3 4 5X
Historic Interest 1 2 3 4 5X
Tranquility 1 2 3 4 5X
Other - please specify:
............RURAL............................. 1 2 3 4 5X
?
Q11: To what extent do you think the following are present in the landscape near where you live (on a scale of 1 to 4):
Aspect: Absent Occasional Frequent Predominant
Houses 1 2 3 4X
Commercial / Industrial buildings 2X 3 4
Nature Reserves / Wildlife 1 2 3 4X
Farmland 1 2 3 4X
Woodland 1 2 3 4X
Degraded / Derelict / Waste land 1 X 3 4
Infastructure (Road / Rail / Pylons etc.) 1 2X 3 4
Leisure / Recreation Facilities 1 2X 3 4
Other - please specify:
......................................... 1 2 3 4
?
Q12: Have we considered the main infrastructure issues? Are there other important issues to consider?
Yes
No
Comments
?
Q13: What do you think the priorities for infrastructure spending should be?
Comments