Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29740
Received: 11/11/2021
Respondent: Dr Murray Wood
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Redrose lane is wholly inadequate as access to the proposed R25 and R26 sites (single track, no pavement, and frequent flooding to list a few reasons)
Inclusion of Redrose Lane route shows a total lack of appreciation for the area and its existing infrastructure.
This amendment feels like desperate attempt to address one of the fundamental issues; there is no sufficient, existing access to sites R25 and R26 to make them viable for inclusion in the LDP.
Redrose lane is wholly inadequate as access to the proposed R25 and R26 sites (single track, no pavement, and frequent flooding to list a few reasons)
Inclusion of Redrose Lane route shows a total lack of appreciation for the area and its existing infrastructure.
This amendment feels like desperate attempt to address one of the fundamental issues; there is no sufficient, existing access to sites R25 and R26 to make them viable for inclusion in the LDP.