Support

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 22338

Received: 17/03/2019

Respondent: Mr Richard Owers

Representation Summary:

We support the creation of new homes on the site.
New development must maintain the established landscape and continue the hedge screened residential character of the area.
Proposed density (55 homes) is a major concern as it is out of keeping and inappropriate. Clever design may create a suitable high density solution.
On site parking sufficient for all residents and visitors to the development essential. (Policy BE17)
The height of the development at the front to be kept to two stories + roof as now to maintain light levels for surrounding residents and the appearance of the road.

Full text:

Whilst we support the creation of additional housing on the site of the old Blood Transfusion Center in Crescent Drive this is with some important provisos

1. Design - We are keen to ensure that the development is a high quality design and that materials are in keeping with the surrounding area. All the residential properties in the area are detached houses and the proposal for 55 dwellings sounds out of character but if this can be achieved so that the development is in keeping with the area then we will be supportive. The building line should follow adjoining properties and height on road frontage should not be dominant and no more than 2 storey + roof as at present. More height at rear of the site is acceptable as the site falls away and it is unlikely to be too overpowering on the character of the area. We are concerned that there has been no consultation to date regarding design etc.

2. Density - We are concerned with the proposed density on this site which is much greater than in the rest of the area. We would like confirmation that Essex Design Guide and Brentwood Policy BE17 that state that there should be 1 space per 1 bed unit and 2 spaces per 2 bed unit are followed. There should also be an additional spaces allocated for visitor spaces. The site is not a town center site and Policy BE17 should be adhered to to avoid parking on surrounding roads.

3. Trees - Policy R18 specifically makes provision for protecting existing trees within the development site. We would like a landscape led proposal that minimises the impact on the adjoining Green Belt. The retention of trees is key for us.

4. Amenity - Within the planning policy it specifically mentions a requirement for public open space to be provided on site. This is important to restrict density and maintain the character of the area.

5. Retirement Homes - Consideration should be including given residential care homes facility or retirement homes as there are a high number of elderly residents in the area, keen to downsize but remain local.

6 No Loss of Light - It is very important that the new