Object

Preferred Site Allocations 2018

Representation ID: 19406

Received: 09/03/2018

Respondent: Mr Peter Wiley

Representation Summary:

(1) The existing infrastructure is already overused, overstretched, any increase will have an adverse effect on the quality of life. (2) Building on Green belt is frowned upon by the current Government. (3) Most of the houses to be built will be too expensive for the local residents and will only affordable for local London residents. (4) Too many Traveller sites, as the area has above the local areas number already. (5) This decision is going against the democratic views, and is a decision made by greed on behalf of the current Council and Developers.

Full text:

I object to the proposals because of the following reasons. (1) The existing infrastructure is already overused, overstretched and any increase will have an adverse effect on the quality of life of the current residents. (2) Building on Green belt is frowned upon by the current Government, why can our Council ignore this. (3)Most , if not about 95%, of the houses to be built will be too expensive for the local residents or their children, and will only affordable for local London residents being forced out of their areas by monetary inducements.If their reason is moving for a lovely area, with green fields this plan will negate this. (4) Too many Traveller sites, as the area has above the local areas number already. (5) This decision is going against the democratic views, and is a decision made by greed on behalf of the current Council and Developers.