Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 18027
Received: 05/03/2018
Respondent: Mr Martin Clark
Site previously discounted on lack of infrastructure (roads, schools, doctors, local public transport). Nothing has changed.
100 dwellings over two sites (077 and 076) in a small village is not acceptable.
There are many brownfield sites and strategic developments that would cater for Brentwood's required housing expansion.
The proposals for the site by Savill/ Crest Nicholson seem to be at odds with Savid Javid's comment 'the construction industry that is too reliant on a small number of big players'. Another case of private developers attempting to maximise their profits at the expense of local public opinion.
Site previously discounted on lack of infrastructure (roads, schools, doctors, local public transport). Nothing has changed.
100 dwellings over two sites (077 and 076) in a small village is not acceptable.
There are many brownfield sites and strategic developments that would cater for Brentwood's required housing expansion.
The proposals for the site by Savill/ Crest Nicholson seem to be at odds with Savid Javid's comment 'the construction industry that is too reliant on a small number of big players'. Another case of private developers attempting to maximise their profits at the expense of local public opinion.