Object

Preferred Site Allocations 2018

Representation ID: 18023

Received: 05/03/2018

Respondent: Mr David Hunwick

Representation Summary:

This Site was previously rejected for development for clear reasons.
The site is entirely green belt. The suggestion that building on it will provide a defensible future barrier is clearly nonsense. You protect valuable green belt by not building on it.
infrastructure does not support development. Schools, dentists, doctors and roads do not have the capacity for more housing in this area.
Honeypot Lane is single file in 2 places and used as a cut through to avoid the town centre. Additional journeys caused by this development will make the congestion and pollution worse with tail backs on junctions.

Full text:

This Site was previously rejected for development for clear reasons.
The site is entirely green belt. The suggestion that building on it will provide a defensible future barrier is clearly nonsense. You protect valuable green belt by not building on it.
infrastructure does not support development. Schools, dentists, doctors and roads do not have the capacity for more housing in this area.
Honeypot Lane is single file in 2 places and used as a cut through to avoid the town centre. Additional journeys caused by this development will make the congestion and pollution worse with tail backs on junctions.