Object

Preferred Site Allocations 2018

Representation ID: 17988

Received: 27/02/2018

Respondent: MR andrew carroll

Representation Summary:

Inappropriate form of development within the Green Belt (currently miss-categorised as Brown Belt) The site access can not be in accordance with acceptable standards and would lead to potential safety hazards.
Un-neighbourly form of development that would have an adverse impact.
Unacceptable loss of privacy, light, view.
The current carpark is and will continue to be a requirement of the town.
The current infrastructure cannot support the additional residents.
Insufficient parking spaces will be adverse through roadside parking on this narrow lane/busy junction etc. Already people are parking on the kerb opposite parked cars on the yellow lines.

Full text:

The proposal represents an inappropriate form of development within the Green Belt (currently miss-categorised as Brown Belt) and in the absence of any special circumstances would by its inappropriateness have a harmful impact on the open and rural character of the Green Belt.
The site access can not be in accordance with acceptable standards and would lead to potential safety hazards.
The proposal size and siting represents and un-neighbourly form of development that would have an adverse impact on the amenity of neighbouring properties by having an overbearing effect.
The proposed development siting would result in an unacceptable loss of privacy, light, view, adversely affecting the amenities enjoyed by the occupiers of the adjacent dwelling houses.
The current carpark is a requirement of the town and continues to be required.
The current infrastructure of roads, buses, shops and trains cannot support the additional residents.
Insufficient parking spaces will adversely affect the amenity of surrounding properties through roadside parking on this narrow lane/busy junction etc. Already people are parking on the kerb opposite parked cars on the yellow lines.
The dwellings will create a cramped building to tree/protected tree relationship which is likely to place detrimental long term pruning pressures on both specimens arising from concerns by future occupants over issues including the size of the trees, safety and overshadowing.