Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Representation ID: 10571

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mrs Christine Hamilton

Representation Summary:

Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Full text:

Q1: No. I strongly disagree with these proposals. There hasn't been sufficient information given.

Q2: No. Housing is needed but not at this volume.

Q3: Yes. The proposed area is countryside. This will change the whole feel of the surrounding village.

Q4: No information has been provided. We only found out about the proposal via Facebook.

Q5: No.

Q6: Develop the brownfield sites. There are plenty.

Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5

Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3

Q12: There is one main road, a single carriageway.

Attachments: