Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 10571
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mrs Christine Hamilton
Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q1: No. I strongly disagree with these proposals. There hasn't been sufficient information given.
Q2: No. Housing is needed but not at this volume.
Q3: Yes. The proposed area is countryside. This will change the whole feel of the surrounding village.
Q4: No information has been provided. We only found out about the proposal via Facebook.
Q5: No.
Q6: Develop the brownfield sites. There are plenty.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 5
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 2
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 2
Infrastructure: 2
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: There is one main road, a single carriageway.