Comment

Representation ID: 19927

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

There are no designated heritage assets within the site. There are a number of designations to the north of the site. The pro-forma does not refer to the presence of these designated heritage assets. As the site is currently an active industrial estate any enhancements that can be made are encouraged. careful consideration should be given to the scale and height of development. These requirements should be included in policy and supported text.

Comment

Representation ID: 19928

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

The pro-forma identifies the Grade II Registered Park and Garden (RPAG) which is
located to the south west of the site. The Grade II listed buildings of Langtons and
Langtons Forge, which are located along the boundary of the RPAG, however have not been referenced. Development of this site will need to conserve and, where opportunities arise, enhance these heritage assets and their setting. The development should be of high quality design. These requirements should be included in any site specific policy and supporting text of the Plan

Comment

Representation ID: 19929

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

There is concern that the development of this site would sever the relationship of the Tower House and Lodge from the main building. The group value of these buildings is an important aspect of their significance. . Development of this site could result in harm to the significance of this group of the listed buildings. We request any site specific policy for this site includes a series of criterion, including any mitigation measures that may be appropriate. A master planning process is advised. The height of new development within the site should also be carefully considered.

Comment

Representation ID: 19931

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

The Grade II listed Nags Head public house sits to the immediate northwest corner of
the site. We are pleased to see that the presence of the designated heritage asset has been identified within the pro-forma. Development of this site will need to conserve and, where opportunities arise, enhance this heritage asset and its setting. The development should be of high quality design. These requirements should be included in any site specific policy and supporting text of the Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 19933

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

There are no designated heritage assets within or near to the site. However, the site
lies immediately adjacent to a Roman Road which increases the likely hood of potential archaeological remains. We are pleased to see that the pro-forma has identified this and the need for archaeological investigations to be carried out prior to development. We request that this is included as a criterion within any site specific policy.

Comment

Representation ID: 19938

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

The proforma has not identified the presence of the heritage assets. Any development of the site will need to be sensitive to this edge of settlement location and relate to the open landscape around it as well as to the historic settlement it adjoins. The surrounding land is of historic interest and also makes a positive contribution to the character and appearance of the conservation area. Development of this site will need to conserve and enhance these heritage assets and there setting. The development should be of high quality design. These requirements should include policy and supporting text.

Comment

Representation ID: 19939

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

The pro-forma has not identified the presence of the heritage assets. Any development of the site will need to be sensitive to this edge of settlement location and relate to the open landscape around it as well as to the historic settlement it adjoins. Development of this site will need to conserve and enhance these heritage assets and there setting. The development should be of high quality design. These requirements should be
included in any site specific policy and supporting text of the Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 19940

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

Any development of the site will need to be sensitive to this edge of settlement location and relate to the open landscape around it as well as to the settlement it adjoins.

Comment

Representation ID: 19941

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

Any development of the site will need to be sensitive to this edge of settlement location and relate to the open landscape around it as well as to the settlement it adjoins.

Comment

Representation ID: 19945

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

It is acknowledged that some of these surrounding heritage assets are severed from the site by the A127 however development of the site still has the potential to impact
upon the setting of the RPAG. It is also not clear how the listed properties within the site are to be treated. Given the sensitive nature of the site and given the lack of supporting evidence on the historic environment, we request that a Heritage Impact Assessment is undertaken in accordance with our advice note 'Site allocations in Local Plans'. We recommend that further archaeological investigation is undertaken and landscape characterisation.