Comment

Representation ID: 19914

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

The development of this site has the potential to harm the significance of these designated heritage assets by eroding their setting. We recommend that any subsequent site specific policy includes criterion to help secure a high quality development which respects the setting of the nearby listed buildings and conservation area. The policy should refer to the sites' sensitive edge of settlement location, the need for high quality design which will relate to both the rural surroundings to the north and to the historic settlement adjoining the site to the south. Careful master planning will be required.

Comment

Representation ID: 19915

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

The development of this site has the potential to harm the significance of these designated heritage assets by eroding their setting. We recommend that any subsequent site specific policy includes criterion to help secure a high quality development which respects the setting of the nearby listed buildings and conservation area. The policy should refer to the sites' sensitive edge of settlement location, the need for high quality design which will relate to both the rural surroundings to the north and to the historic settlement adjoining the site to the south. Careful master planning will be required.

Comment

Representation ID: 19916

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

the allocation and subsequent development of this site has the potential to result harm the significance of the existing group of Grade II listed hospital buildings. The extent of harm will depend on the master planning process as some parts of the site will be more sensitive than others. We recommend that specific criterion are referred to in any forthcoming site specific policy to ensure the setting and group value attributed to these listed buildings is conserved. We feel that our concerns surrounding this allocation could be resolved through appropriate policy wording and criterion.

Comment

Representation ID: 19917

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

This site contains a number of listed buildings and is located near to a Registered Park and Garden, two scheduled monuments and a range of other Grade II* and Grade II listed buildings. There is concern that there is inadequate evidence to support the allocation of this site at this stage. We request that a Heritage Impact Assessment is undertaken to provide a better understanding of the site and of the potential impacts upon heritage assets within the site and around its boundary. Historic Landscape Characterisation and archaeological assessments should also be carried out.

Object

Representation ID: 19918

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

This site abuts the boundary of a Grade II listed building and seems to incorporate some of its curtilage buildings. There is concern regarding the proximity to this heritage asset and the subsequent impact upon its significance. Information regarding setting, character and significance will need to be provided to determine if the boundary should be pulled back. This assessment should be proportionate to the significance of the heritage asset and the nature of employment development. This should inform a site specific policy. We are unable to support this allocation.

Comment

Representation ID: 19919

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

The Brentwood Town Centre Conservation Area lies to the south of the site. We are
pleased to see that the site pro-forma identifies the presence of the conservation
area. Development of this site will need to conserve and, where opportunities arise,
enhance the conservation area and its setting. The development should be of high
quality design. These requirements should be included in any site specific policy and
supporting text of the Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 19920

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

This site lies within the Brentwood Town Centre Conservation Area and next to the
Grade II listed Gardeners Arms Inn. We are pleased to see that the site pro-forma identifies the presence of the conservation area however the presence of the
adjacent Grade II listed building is not. Development of this site will need to conserve
and, where opportunities arise, enhance these heritage assets and their setting. The
development should be of high quality design. These requirements should be
included in any site specific policy and supporting text of the Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 19921

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

This site lies immediately adjacent to the Town Centre Conservation Area and the Grade II listed building. We are pleased to see that both of these heritage assets have been identified. Development of this site will need to conserve and enhance these heritage assets and their setting. Careful consideration should be given to the height and scale. The development should be of high quality design. These requirements should be included in any site specific policy and supporting text of the Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 19922

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

The Grade II listed Blenheim House and Grade II listed Chapel of the Royal Anglian
Regiment and Essex Regiment are located to the immediate west of site 117A. We
are pleased to see that both of these heritage assets have been identified within the site pro-forma. Development of this site will need to conserve and, where opportunities arise, enhance these heritage assets and their setting. The development should be of high quality design. These requirements should be included in any site specific policy and supporting text of the Plan.

Comment

Representation ID: 19923

Received: 26/03/2018

Respondent: Historic England

Whilst the pro-forma does identify the presence of the conservation area it does not reference the listed building. Given the high grade of designation Historic England would be a statutory consultee when considering the development of the site. We request that any forthcoming site specific policy identifies these designated heritage assets. Development of this site will need to conserve and enhance these heritage assets and their setting. The development should be of high quality design. These requirements should be included in any site specific policy and supporting text of the Plan.