Strategic Growth Options
Search representations
Results for London Borough of Havering search
New searchComment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 5
Representation ID: 5415
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: London Borough of Havering
If sites in A12 corridor adjacent to the Havering Borough boundary are taken forward into the Draft Brentwood Local Development Plan then LB Havering will need to carefully consider any proposals for these sites. (Specifically sites 175B & 175C) Depending on the scale and nature of development there are likely to be issues for Havering in terms of, for example, transport and the impact of development on the openess and character of the area.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
175B Land at M25 J28, Brook Street, Brentwood (including existing buildings), and surrounding land
Representation ID: 5416
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: London Borough of Havering
If sites is taken forward into the Draft Brentwood Local Development Plan then LB Havering will need to carefully consider any proposals for these sites. Depending on the scale and nature of development there are likely to be issues for Havering in terms of, for example, transport and the impact of development on the openess and character of the area.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
175C Land at M25 J28, Brook Street, Brentwood (including existing buildings), and surrounding land
Representation ID: 5417
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: London Borough of Havering
If sites in A12 corridor adjacent to the Havering Borough boundary are taken forward into the Draft Brentwood Local Development Plan then LB Havering will need to carefully consider any proposals for these sites. (Specifically sites 175B & 175C) Depending on the scale and nature of development there are likely to be issues for Havering in terms of, for example, transport and the impact of development on the openess and character of the area.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
101A Land at Codham Hall (including M25 Works Site at A127/M25 junction 29)
Representation ID: 5418
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: London Borough of Havering
The document identifies site 101A (Land at Cobham Hall, including M25 work site at A127/M25 Junction 29) as a potential new employment site - Brentwood Enterprise Park. This is in line with its identification in the 2013 Preferred Options report. As this is adjacent to the Havering borough boundary, the Council will want to see further detail on proposals for this site should it be taken forward into the Draft Brentwood Local Development Plan later in 2015.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
GT001 Lilliputs, Chelmsford Road, Blackmore
Representation ID: 5419
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: London Borough of Havering
Appendix 1 of the documents lists 19 existing gypsy and traveller sites in Brentwood, a number of which are in the Navestock area, close to the Havering borough boundary. However, only 10 of the 19 sites are identified on the maps on pages 16 to 19. Further clarification on where all 19 existing sites are located is necessary. Information on pitch numbers on each existing site should also be included.
The document notes that the Council will need to consider national policy and the conclusions of the 2014 Essex Gypsy and Traveller Assessment when preparing the Draft Brentwood Local Development Plan. This version of the plan should include current and future pitch numbers and details of new or extended existing sites for comment.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
1.13 Evidence
Representation ID: 5420
Received: 18/02/2015
Respondent: London Borough of Havering
Appendix 1 of the documents lists 19 existing gypsy and traveller sites in Brentwood, a number of which are in the Navestock area, close to the Havering borough boundary. However, only 10 of the 19 sites are identified on the maps on pages 16 to 19. Further clarification on where all 19 existing sites are located is necessary. Information on pitch numbers on each existing site should also be included.
The document notes that the Council will need to consider national policy and the conclusions of the 2014 Essex Gypsy and Traveller Assessment when preparing the Draft Brentwood Local Development Plan. This version of the plan should include current and future pitch numbers and details of new or extended existing sites for comment.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 5
Representation ID: 7195
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: London Borough of Havering
Havering has specific concerns about sites 175B and 175C being taken forward into the Draft Brentwood Local Development Plan, regardless of the form of development (housing or mixed use). Both sites are in the Green Belt and development on this land would have significant impact on the character and openness of Green Belt. Development of these sites and site 32 (also Green Belt land) would result in a form of ribbon development along the A12 from Brentwood / Brook Street to the Havering boundary.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
175C Land at M25 J28, Brook Street, Brentwood (including existing buildings), and surrounding land
Representation ID: 7197
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: London Borough of Havering
LBH has specific concerns about this site. It is acknowledged that all sites are potential development sites only at this stage.
-Development of this site will impact on the character and openness of Green Belt contrary to its purpose set out in paragraphy 80 within the NPPF.
-This site in conjunction with 175B and 32 would form continuous ribbon development along the A12 to the Havering border from Brook Street
- The site is adjacent to the Ingrebourne Valley Metropolitan Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC)
- Development here would have significant implications for the A12 and A127, in particular the Gallows corner junction.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 12
Representation ID: 7198
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: London Borough of Havering
Development of these sites (175B 175C and 32) would have significant transport implications, with a considerable potential adverse impact on Havering's section of the A12 and the A127 and the rest of 'our' road network, particularly the Gallows Corner junction but also through displacement elsewhere into the Havering highways network, especially when there are difficulties elsewhere on the strategic road network.
The A12 and A127 are the responsibility of TfL within LBH. Both roads are essential elements of our highway infrastructure. Havering's residents and businesses and those further afield are highly dependent on these key routes for living and business prosperity.
There is concern that additional development will adversely affect traffic flows on these already heavily trafficked routes, and will have detrimental environmental impacts. Gallows Corner is a traffic "hotspot" and LBH have highlighted to TfL the importance of major improvements here.
Development of site 101A would have potential adverse impacts on Haverings section of the A127, which is already close to capacity in peak periods in both directions.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 5
Representation ID: 7200
Received: 13/03/2015
Respondent: London Borough of Havering
Havering has specific concerns about sites 175B and 175C being taken forward into the Draft Brentwood Local Development Plan, regardless of the form of development (housing or mixed use). Both sites are in the Green Belt and development on this land would have significant impact on the character and openness of Green Belt. Development of these sites and site 32 (also Green Belt land) would result in a form of ribbon development along the A12 from Brentwood / Brook Street to the Havering boundary.