Strategic Growth Options

Search representations

Results for Countryside Properties search

New search New search

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

1.13 Evidence

Representation ID: 12687

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Colliers International

Representation Summary:

The plan is not supported by a robust, up to date evidence base as required by the NPPF. There are a number of evidence documents listed as forthcoming on key matters such as economic, housing, environmental, transport, leisure and facilities and renewable energy.

In terms of the overall level of growth proposed there are key omissions including the absence of an up to date SHMA and the reliance on population projections contained in the now superseded version of the Greater Essex Demographic Forecasts Study (Phase 6) published in September 2014. Also lack of reference to the implications of Crossrail on housing need in Brentwood. The PPG is clear that population projections are the starting point only and housing figures need to take into account other measures of need.

The Council is unable to demonstrate a 5 year supply of deliverable sites.

The OAN figure of 366 dwellings per annum is not considered to be true as it is not based on up to date assessment of housing need, including lack of up to date SHMA and most recent population projections set out in the Greater Essex Demographic Study. The proposed housing figure has not been adjusted to take into account market conditions such as affordability.

The Council needs to take into account any unmet needs from adjoining authorities this could include that from London Authorities.

There should be a borough wide Green Belt review to potentially release sustainable sites adjoining existing urban areas. There should also be a review of realistic densities on identified brownfield sites which could end up being a lot lower.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

1.13 Evidence

Representation ID: 12697

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

A key concern is that this consultation is not supported by a robust, up to date evidence base as required by the National Planning Policy Framework. The consultation document refers to a number of technical studies that are predominantly described as 'forthcoming'. The concern is that the preparation of the plan is advancing ahead of the available evidence base.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Life of the Plan

Representation ID: 12700

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

Plan needs to take account of shortfalls since NPPF published, and have at least 15 years life from adoption. Plan proposed to run until 2030 but not projected to be adopted until 2017, giving only a life of 13 years. Given the Council is required to review Green Belt boundaries and define boundaries that endure, a longer period should be proposed to provide certainty given that larger sites may deliver beyond 2030. Suggest 2035 as end date.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Question 1

Representation ID: 12704

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

North of Borough: Smaller sites in larger villages could meet local need. These settlements should be identified in the Plan, but strategy should not rely on these as source of housing provision.

A12 Corridor: Area appropriate for development and change, Borough's main location for services and employment with transport infrastructure and Crossrail. Areas with no significant contribution to Green Belt should be allocated, such as land at Bayleys Mead [site 030].

A127 Corridor: Most appropriate strategy to focus strategic development at land east of West Horndon [sites 038, 126], complemented by smaller scale development in A12 corridor [sites 023, 030].

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Question 2

Representation ID: 12705

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

North of Borough: Smaller sites in larger villages could meet local need. These settlements should be identified in the Plan, but strategy should not rely on these as source of housing provision.

A12 Corridor: Area appropriate for development and change, Borough's main location for services and employment with transport infrastructure and Crossrail. Areas with no significant contribution to Green Belt should be allocated, such as land at Bayleys Mead [site 030].

A127 Corridor: Most appropriate strategy to focus strategic development at land east of West Horndon [sites 038, 126], complemented by smaller scale development in A12 corridor [sites 023, 030].

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Question 6

Representation ID: 12741

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

Smaller sites in larger villages could meet local need. These settlements should be identified in the Plan, but strategy should not rely on these as source of housing provision.

Attachments:

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Question 4

Representation ID: 13037

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

The most appropriate strategy for Brentwood Borough is to focus strategic development through an urban extension to the east of West Horndon.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

030 Land at Bayleys Mead, off Hanging Hill Lane, Hutton

Representation ID: 13038

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

SHLAA concluded site could deliver 105 dwellings during years 5-10 (see attached with updated comments). Attached sets out site assessments, including:
- Performs poorly against NPPF Green Belt tests. Borough has 13,500 hectares of Green Belt, site (1.57 hectares) represents 0.02%.
- Natural Hutton extension, minimal countryside impact, trees screen and contain.
- Close to public transport, services and facilities. No insuperable constraints regarding access, surface water and foul drainage, and contaminated land.
- Bayleys Mead width can support existing and proposed development without adverse impact.
- Trees variable, proposal retains higher quality trees without adverse impact.
- Limited ecology.

Attachments:

Support

Strategic Growth Options

Question 5

Representation ID: 13039

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Countryside Properties

Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd

Representation Summary:

Site 030 Land at Bayleys Mead off Hanging Hill Lane is suitable as urban extension on edge of Brentwood urban area. [See also Rep ID 13038]

Attachments:

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.