Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Search representations

Results for Childerditch Properties search

New search New search

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

POLICY PC05: EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA

Representation ID: 24357

Received: 19/03/2019

Respondent: Childerditch Properties

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Policy PC05 does not specify whether it applies to existing and/or new employment land. The policy simply refers to development for employment uses. The wording of Policy PC05 is therefore ambiguous and is more restrictive than the site specific policy for Childerditch Industrial Estate (Policy E12). For example, Policy E12 requires provision to be made for improved walking and cycling links within the surrounding area. Policy PC05 on the other hand states that employment uses will be encouraged provided that the proposal is accessible by public transport. At present, there are no public transport connections directly available to Childerditch Industrial Estate, and whilst this may change in the future, there is no guarantee of if and when this will happen. On this basis, we object to Policy PC05 in its current form as it would not allow for an effective Plan.

Support

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

POLICY NE9: GREEN BELT

Representation ID: 24358

Received: 19/03/2019

Respondent: Childerditch Properties

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

Policy NE9 is supported. The Council has recognised the need to release some land from the Green Belt in order to meet its housing and employment needs. However, the land that will remain within the Green Belt should be protected throughout the Plan period and Policy NE9 achieves this, in accordance with the NPPF.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

POLICY NE13: SITE ALLOCATIONS IN THE GREEN BELT

Representation ID: 24359

Received: 19/03/2019

Respondent: Childerditch Properties

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

It is considered that Policy NE13 should be removed from the PSLP. The criteria of the policy can be included other policies, such as the site specific policy for Childerditch Industrial Estate (Policy E12), and it is therefore not considered necessary to have a standalone policy duplicating these points. Furthermore, it is queried why the policy refers to the benefits of housing sites only and no other land uses.

Support

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

POLICY E12: CHILDERDITCH INDUSTRIAL ESTATE

Representation ID: 24364

Received: 19/03/2019

Respondent: Childerditch Properties

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Representation Summary:

Childerditch Industrial Estate: Policy E12 is supported. We consider that it is justified, effective, consistent with national policy and necessary for the reasons set out elsewhere in these representations. Policy E12 proposes to allocate land that has previously been promoted at the Range North (site 112D) and the land to the south (site 112E), in addition to the existing Childerditch Industrial Estate, to provide a total developable area of 20.64 hectares across the entire Estate. The release of these sites from the Green Belt is justified and will ensure that the Plan has been positively prepared. At present, Childerditch Industrial Estate offers some 35 units. As part of the work supporting these representations, CMP Architects have undertaken an analysis of the Estate to identify how the existing Park could be regenerated for existing occupiers, redeveloped in areas to maximise efficiency, and expanded for future employment growth demand. The proposed masterplan at Appendix 1 provided for indicative purposes to support these representations, demonstrates the deliverability of the site over a period of time. The proposed allocations will extend the size of the Estate and as a whole, it is considered that it has the potential to accommodate around 50 units following redevelopment. The development of The Range North (site 112D) as a first phase will assist with the provision of funding to begin the process of upgrading the existing units and infrastructure at the Estate, which will ultimately lead to the development of the southern extension. This infrastructure will include an improved primary route through the core of the site and a number of secondary routes stemming from this to provide access to the different areas of the site. . It is very much expected that development will commence on site within the first few years of the Plan period. . In respect of Part B, criterion b) of Policy E12, we support the principle of improving walking and cycling links within the land owned by our client, which extends to Little Warley Hall Lane. However, we object to Part B, criterion c) of Policy E12, as it is not considered to be necessary (refer to Appendix 2 included in the submitted documents).

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Sustainability Appraisal

Representation ID: 24372

Received: 19/03/2019

Respondent: Childerditch Properties

Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The SA forms only one part of the evidence base underlining the PSLP. The evidence base also includes documents such as the Brentwood Economic Futures 2013-2033 Report, Green Belt Study and Transport Assessment. In allocating additional land at Childerditch Industrial Estate, Brentwood Borough Council has taken a balanced judgement on the site constraints and the need to provide to create additional employment opportunities within the Borough. The SA is currently focused on a spatial approach to the assessment of each criterion, using the distance between the site and various factors to judge the extent to which it either achieves certain objectives or not. However, it is considered that the SA fails to fully consider the nature of each proposal or the likelihood in practice of effects in sustainability terms, where a 'broad brush' approach has instead been taken to sites regardless of their intended use. For example, in respect of distance to a GP Practice, the proposed employment allocations at Childerditch Industrial Estate have been scored in the same manner as a residential allocation. However, it is considered to be less important for an employment site to be located within close proximity to a GP practice than a residential site, given the nature of the uses. Therefore, Childerditch Industrial Estate should be considered against a different set of criteria more relevant to the proposed employment allocation. ). On review of the appraisal of Childerditch Industrial Estate, the site has not scored particularly well in relation to the criteria that has data available. However, it is considered that the SA, or at least the sustainability criteria, could be too sensitive when it comes to assessing sites against the criteria. The fact that no site performed 'particularly well' against any of the criteria suggests that the scope of the assessment makes many sites appear unsustainable, with limited opportunity to score 'green' in many of the objectives. We do not consider that the sustainability of the site has been considered in sufficient detail by the SA given the particular circumstances of the site and existing uses.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.