Object

Representation ID: 30762

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Ronald Sanders

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

BBC reduced the number of houses to be built from 70 to 50. For the inspector to increase the number back to 70 despite public opinion.

Object

Representation ID: 30782

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Anthony Parris

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

You are proposing 50/70 house on Green Belt land. There is no infrastructure to deal with this amount of extra traffic. Schools couldn't cope, that in itself would cause more traffic on roads around our small village. No affordable homes for young villagers. It would not bring in any local jobs. By building these homes here, you are just concerning yourself with numbers rather than sense.

Object

Representation ID: 30798

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Jennifer Barry

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Flooding area in and around Blackmore. Will BBC be taking responsibility for the flooding risk which will be bound to repeat due to proposed development and climate change. Not sustainable location as Blackmore is at capacity for existing residents. Primary school is full, no senior school here.

Object

Representation ID: 30806

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mr Stephen Slaughter

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Blackmore has a long history of flooding, developing 2 green fields will make it worse. BBC did not carry out exceptional circumstances test.

Object

Representation ID: 30820

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Mrs Janis Smith

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Brentwood Council have ignored all representations given by BVHA concerning our much love local village and in doing so has/is ignoring the right needs for the village and all who live here. Flooding and drainage capacity cannot cop. Local amenities and infrastructure cannot cop ie. shops, car park, broadband. Planners are willing to throw Green Belt protection out the door.

Object

Representation ID: 30823

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Miss Carole Scott

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Object, with the below reasons: Unaffordable properties. Flodding. Increase footfall on tiny village. Green Belt. The effect of development on schools, traffic, doctor's surgery.

Object

Representation ID: 30824

Received: 09/12/2021

Respondent: Ms Mollie Stenning

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Blackmore does not meet strategic aim for BBC or government, has poor public transport. Development will rely on car use, resulting in more pollution, congestion. Blackmore has a history of flooding, removing 2 large fields will make the situation worse.