MM93
Support
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29520
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
2. Justified
4. Consistent with National Policy
The proposed modification to criterion 2. of Policy R10 is consistent with the requirements of the NPPF.
2. Justified
4. Consistent with National Policy
The proposed modification to criterion 2. of Policy R10 is consistent with the requirements of the NPPF.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29554
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
3. Not Effective
Clarity is required for both applicants and decision makers in relation to the policy requirement criterion 3.b. for ‘quietway’ cycle routes connecting transfer hubs.
As currently drafted the policy provides limited detail and the supporting text provides no guidance on what a ‘quietway’ cycle route is and their locations, or what a transfer hub is and their locations.
BBC should include appropriate wording within the supporting text to address this.
3. Not Effective
Clarity is required for both applicants and decision makers in relation to the policy requirement criterion 3.b. for ‘quietway’ cycle routes connecting transfer hubs.
As currently drafted the policy provides limited detail and the supporting text provides no guidance on what a ‘quietway’ cycle route is and their locations, or what a transfer hub is and their locations.
BBC should include appropriate wording within the supporting text to address this.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29562
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
3. Not Effective
Criterion 1.d. of Policy R10 seeks to ensure that the parking on site is sufficient to meet the existing and future rail traveller needs. BCC should be satisfied that this can be achieved and does not conflict with other polices in the Local Plan, such as BE13 Sustainable Means of Travel and Walkable Streets and BE17 Parking Standards.
This reflects ECC’s Reg.19 Rep 22464.
3. Not Effective
Criterion 1.d. of Policy R10 seeks to ensure that the parking on site is sufficient to meet the existing and future rail traveller needs. BCC should be satisfied that this can be achieved and does not conflict with other polices in the Local Plan, such as BE13 Sustainable Means of Travel and Walkable Streets and BE17 Parking Standards.
This reflects ECC’s Reg.19 Rep 22464.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29589
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
2.Not Justified
3.Not Effective
4.Not Consistent with National Policy
ECC as Lead Local Flood Authority for BBC consider inclusion of supporting text for site specific policies, including references to specific Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) that affect development, provides clarity to applicants/decisions makers of need for consideration of CDAs at beginning of planning process.
Replace paragraph 9.136 to ensure factual representation of current flooding position, in line with paragraphs 159 and 160 of the NPPF.
Reflects ECC’s Reg.19 Rep 22469, position in Statement of Common Ground (F17D) between BBC and ECC, and position in ECC’s Hearing Statement G7AN – paragraph 1.4.
2. Not Justified
3. Not Effective
4. Not Consistent with National Policy
ECC as the Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) for BBC consider that the inclusion of site specific text within the supporting text of the site specific policies, in particular, including the references to the specific Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) that affect the development, will provide clarity to applicants and decisions makers of the need for consideration of specific CDAs at the beginning of the planning process.
Paragraph 9.136 should be replaced to ensure factual representation of the current position in respect of flooding, in line with paragraphs 159 and 160 of the NPPF.
This reflects ECC’s Reg.19 Rep 22469, the position in the Statement of Common Ground (F17D) between BBC and ECC, and the position in ECC’s Hearing Statement G7AN – paragraph 1.4.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29668
Received: 09/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
2.Not Justified
3.Not Effective
4.Not Consistent with National Policy
ECC as highway and transportation authority welcomes inclusion of text within criterion 1.b identifying the Brentwood Cycle Action Plan.
In order to futureproof the policy and ensure that development provides the appropriate walking and cycling provision in the future, in line with paragraphs 92.c, 104 c, and 106d of NPPF, the supporting text should provide clarity on the types of other ‘relevant evidence’ which is referenced in the Policy. It should be made clear that such evidence should include details on future key destinations and attractors for walking and cycling connections.
2.Not Justified
3.Not Effective
4.Not Consistent with National Policy
ECC as highway and transportation authority welcomes inclusion of text within criterion 1.b identifying the Brentwood Cycle Action Plan.
In order to futureproof the policy and ensure that development provides the appropriate walking and cycling provision in the future, in line with paragraphs 92.c, 104 c, and 106d of NPPF, the supporting text should provide clarity on the types of other ‘relevant evidence’ which is referenced in the Policy. It should be made clear that such evidence should include details on future key destinations and attractors for walking and cycling connections.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29727
Received: 10/11/2021
Respondent: Ms Barbara Connelly
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
200+ homes = 350 more cars ! No space for these locally plus where do the cars thst would park at the station now park- in local streets which cannot sustain local parking.
Concerns re air quality and flooding : this area is already congested and where is the provision for additional schools, drs and services as we lack these locally already
200+ homes = 350 more cars ! No space for these locally plus where do the cars thst would park at the station now park- in local streets which cannot sustain local parking.
Concerns re air quality and flooding : this area is already congested and where is the provision for additional schools, drs and services as we lack these locally already
Support
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 30045
Received: 29/11/2021
Respondent: TfL Commercial Development
Agent: TfL Commercial Development
- The increase in site capacity from 100 to 200 homes which is in line with the NPPF para 103 is supported. - The proposed amendments to part d of the policy allows increased flexibility and is therefore supported by TfL Commercial Development (CD). - TfL CD supports the amendment to the boundary of the site allocation R10 Brentwood Railway Station Car Park
See attached