MM90
Support
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29517
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
2. Justified
4. Consistent with National Policy
The proposed modification to criterion 2. of Policy R07 is consistent with the requirements of the NPPF.
2. Justified
4. Consistent with National Policy
The proposed modification to criterion 2. of Policy R07 is consistent with the requirements of the NPPF.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29552
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
3. Not Effective
Clarity is required for both applicants and decision makers in relation to the policy requirement criterion 3.b. for ‘quietway’ cycle routes connecting transfer hubs.
As currently drafted the policy provides limited detail and the supporting text provides no guidance on what a ‘quietway’ cycle route is and their locations, or what a transfer hub is and their locations.
BBC should include appropriate wording within the supporting text to address this.
3. Not Effective
Clarity is required for both applicants and decision makers in relation to the policy requirement criterion 3.b. for ‘quietway’ cycle routes connecting transfer hubs.
As currently drafted the policy provides limited detail and the supporting text provides no guidance on what a ‘quietway’ cycle route is and their locations, or what a transfer hub is and their locations.
BBC should include appropriate wording within the supporting text to address this.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29588
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
2.Not Justified
3.Not Effective
4.Not Consistent with National Policy
ECC as Lead Local Flood Authority for BBC consider inclusion of supporting text for site specific policies, including references to specific Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) that affect development, provides clarity to applicants/decisions makers of need for consideration of CDAs at beginning of planning process.
Replace paragraph 9.121 to ensure factual representation of current flooding position, in line with paragraphs 159 and 160 of the NPPF.
Reflects ECC’s Reg.19 Rep 22455, position in Statement of Common Ground (F17D) between BBC and ECC, and position in ECC’s Hearing Statement G7AN – paragraph 1.18.
2. Not Justified
3. Not Effective
4. Not Consistent with National Policy
ECC as the Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA) for BBC consider that the inclusion of site specific text within the supporting text of the site specific policies, in particular, including the references to the specific Critical Drainage Areas (CDAs) that affect the development, and to the potential risk of flooding, and links back to the sustainable drainage and flood risk policies in the Local Plan, will provide clarity to applicants and decisions makers of the need for consideration of specific CDAs at the beginning of the planning process.
Paragraph 9.121 should be replaced to ensure factual representation of the current position in respect of flooding, in line with paragraphs 159 and 160 of the NPPF.
This reflects ECC’s Reg.19 Reps 22455, the position in the Statement of Common Ground (F17D) between BBC and ECC, and the position in ECC’s Hearing Statement G7AN – paragraph 1.18.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29667
Received: 09/11/2021
Respondent: Essex County Council
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
2.Not Justified
3.Not Effective
4.Not Consistent with National Policy
ECC as highway and transportation authority welcomes inclusion of text within criterion 1.b identifying the Brentwood Cycle Action Plan.
In order to futureproof the policy and ensure that development provides the appropriate walking and cycling provision in the future, in line with paragraphs 92.c, 104 c, and 106d of NPPF, the supporting text should provide clarity on the types of other ‘relevant evidence’ which is referenced in the Policy. It should be made clear that such evidence should include details on future key destinations and attractors for walking and cycling connections.
2.Not Justified
3.Not Effective
4.Not Consistent with National Policy
ECC as highway and transportation authority welcomes inclusion of text within criterion 1.b identifying the Brentwood Cycle Action Plan.
In order to futureproof the policy and ensure that development provides the appropriate walking and cycling provision in the future, in line with paragraphs 92.c, 104 c, and 106d of NPPF, the supporting text should provide clarity on the types of other ‘relevant evidence’ which is referenced in the Policy. It should be made clear that such evidence should include details on future key destinations and attractors for walking and cycling connections.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29803
Received: 24/11/2021
Respondent: Sow & Grow Nursery
Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Dwelling Numbers: Para. 9.117 is proposed to be amended to read “around 37 homes”. This conflicts with the text of Policy R07. There needs to be consistency with the Policy wording and therefore this is an apparent error requiring correction in para. 9.117 to read as follows: “around 38 new homes”. The delivery date may slip a year and the amendment should accordingly read “2022/2024”.
See attached
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29805
Received: 24/11/2021
Respondent: Sow & Grow Nursery
Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
1b: The requirement to provide for good pedestrian and cycle connections is unclear when this requirement cannot be physically provided and installed on the allocated Site R07. The need for the requirement requires justification.
1c: Development at the allocation is very unlikely to cause harm to the asset or its setting. Accordingly is this criterion to the Policy justified? Further and clearer justification for this criterion to be part of a development principle of the allocation as drafted is required.
3b: reference to “quietway cycle routes connecting transfer hubs to schools in Brentwood Town Centre is not understood.
The requirement and justification for a financial contribution by this site in this location to the scheme routes described in the Cycle Plan is unclear.
Amended paragraph 9.120: The justification for this paragraph is unclear and needs to be made clear.
See attached
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29807
Received: 24/11/2021
Respondent: Ms Heather Dunbar
Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Dwelling Numbers: Para. 9.117 is proposed to be amended to read “around 37 homes”. This conflicts with the text of Policy R07. There needs to be consistency with the Policy wording and therefore this is an apparent error requiring correction in para. 9.117 to read as follows: “around 38 new homes”. The delivery date may slip a year and the amendment should accordingly read “2022/2024”.
See attached
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29808
Received: 24/11/2021
Respondent: Ms Heather Dunbar
Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
1b: The requirement to provide for good pedestrian and cycle connections is unclear when this requirement cannot be physically provided and installed on the allocated Site R07. The need for the requirement requires justification.
1c: Development at the allocation is very unlikely to cause harm to the asset or its setting. Accordingly is this criterion to the Policy justified? Further and clearer justification for this criterion to be part of a development principle of the allocation as drafted is required.
3b: reference to “quietway cycle routes connecting transfer hubs to schools in Brentwood Town Centre is not understood.
The requirement and justification for a financial contribution by this site in this location to the scheme routes described in the Cycle Plan is unclear.
Amended paragraph 9.120: The justification for this paragraph is unclear and needs to be made clear
See attached
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29811
Received: 24/11/2021
Respondent: Sow & Grow Nursery
Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Dwelling Numbers: Para. 9.117 is proposed to be amended to read “around 37 homes”. This conflicts with the text of Policy R07. There needs to be consistency with the Policy wording and therefore this is an apparent error requiring correction in para. 9.117 to read as follows: “around 38 new homes”. The delivery date may slip a year and the amendment should accordingly read “2022/2024”.
See attached
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29812
Received: 24/11/2021
Respondent: Sow & Grow Nursery
Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
1b: The requirement to provide for good pedestrian and cycle connections is unclear when this requirement cannot be physically provided and installed on the allocated Site R07. The need for the requirement requires justification.
1c: Development at the allocation is very unlikely to cause harm to the asset or its setting. Accordingly is this criterion to the Policy justified? Further and clearer justification for this criterion to be part of a development principle of the allocation as drafted is required.
3b: reference to “quietway cycle routes connecting transfer hubs to schools in Brentwood Town Centre is not understood.
The requirement and justification for a financial contribution by this site in this location to the scheme routes described in the Cycle Plan is unclear.
Amended paragraph 9.120: The justification for this paragraph is unclear and needs to be made clear.
See attached
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29815
Received: 24/11/2021
Respondent: Ms Maxine Armiger
Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Dwelling Numbers: Para. 9.117 is proposed to be amended to read “around 37 homes”. This conflicts with the text of Policy R07. There needs to be consistency with the Policy wording and therefore this is an apparent error requiring correction in para. 9.117 to read as follows: “around 38 new homes”. The delivery date may slip a year and the amendment should accordingly read “2022/2024”.
See attached
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29817
Received: 24/11/2021
Respondent: Ms Maxine Armiger
Agent: MR ALAN WIPPERMAN
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
1b: The requirement to provide for good pedestrian and cycle connections is unclear when this requirement cannot be physically provided and installed on the allocated Site R07. The need for the requirement requires justification.
1c: Development at the allocation is very unlikely to cause harm to the asset or its setting. Accordingly is this criterion to the Policy justified? Further and clearer justification for this criterion to be part of a development principle of the allocation as drafted is required.
3b: reference to “quietway cycle routes connecting transfer hubs to schools in Brentwood Town Centre is not understood.
The requirement and justification for a financial contribution by this site in this location to the scheme routes described in the Cycle Plan is unclear.
Amended paragraph 9.120: The justification for this paragraph is unclear and needs to be made clear.
See attached