MM83

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Schedule of Potential Main Modifications

Representation ID: 29570

Received: 04/11/2021

Respondent: Mrs Helen Pearson

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

75 is an over development!
More cars, green space taken away leads to poor air quality
Only one access at dangerous point, no independent assessment of safety or traffic flow.
Residents concerns ignored

Full text:

Original number of 45 houses, as advised by Council was reasonable for site and utilities. This overdevelopment is solely to make developers profit. More cars.It will result in increased air pollution!
There is now only to be one access. The access onto Priests Lane has not been independently assessed, only a biased assessment by the developers who have misrepresented the facts. The access point joins Priests Lane at a dangerous place in the road. It fails to address the safety of residents. There is already congestion at this point and hazards such as vehicles mounting the pavement to turn onto Priests Lane.
The concerns of residents who live here and use Priests Lane have been totally ignored. 750 people signed a petition against this development!

Object

Schedule of Potential Main Modifications

Representation ID: 29728

Received: 10/11/2021

Respondent: Gita Mackintosh

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Disagree with building on William Hunter way, north shenfield, doddinghurst road, wates way and nags head lane. These sites are already densely populated with poor road infrastructure. Public transport won’t solve grid lock traffic. Also there will be too much pressure on school places and health. This isn’t thought through. There is no village feel it will be densely London suburbia. Completely goes against maintaining a village feel and characteristics of Brentwood. The town is changing rapidly and this just doesn’t match against the proposed ethos.

Full text:

Disagree with building on William Hunter way, north shenfield, doddinghurst road, wates way and nags head lane. These sites are already densely populated with poor road infrastructure. Public transport won’t solve grid lock traffic. Also there will be too much pressure on school places and health. This isn’t thought through. There is no village feel it will be densely London suburbia. Completely goes against maintaining a village feel and characteristics of Brentwood. The town is changing rapidly and this just doesn’t match against the proposed ethos.

Object

Schedule of Potential Main Modifications

Representation ID: 29729

Received: 10/11/2021

Respondent: Gita Mackintosh

Legally compliant? No

Sound? No

Representation Summary:

Why build where there is a risk of flooding? This shows infrastructure is not sound.

Full text:

Why build where there is a risk of flooding? This shows infrastructure is not sound.