MM83
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29570
Received: 04/11/2021
Respondent: Mrs Helen Pearson
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
75 is an over development!
More cars, green space taken away leads to poor air quality
Only one access at dangerous point, no independent assessment of safety or traffic flow.
Residents concerns ignored
Original number of 45 houses, as advised by Council was reasonable for site and utilities. This overdevelopment is solely to make developers profit. More cars.It will result in increased air pollution!
There is now only to be one access. The access onto Priests Lane has not been independently assessed, only a biased assessment by the developers who have misrepresented the facts. The access point joins Priests Lane at a dangerous place in the road. It fails to address the safety of residents. There is already congestion at this point and hazards such as vehicles mounting the pavement to turn onto Priests Lane.
The concerns of residents who live here and use Priests Lane have been totally ignored. 750 people signed a petition against this development!
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29728
Received: 10/11/2021
Respondent: Gita Mackintosh
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Disagree with building on William Hunter way, north shenfield, doddinghurst road, wates way and nags head lane. These sites are already densely populated with poor road infrastructure. Public transport won’t solve grid lock traffic. Also there will be too much pressure on school places and health. This isn’t thought through. There is no village feel it will be densely London suburbia. Completely goes against maintaining a village feel and characteristics of Brentwood. The town is changing rapidly and this just doesn’t match against the proposed ethos.
Disagree with building on William Hunter way, north shenfield, doddinghurst road, wates way and nags head lane. These sites are already densely populated with poor road infrastructure. Public transport won’t solve grid lock traffic. Also there will be too much pressure on school places and health. This isn’t thought through. There is no village feel it will be densely London suburbia. Completely goes against maintaining a village feel and characteristics of Brentwood. The town is changing rapidly and this just doesn’t match against the proposed ethos.
Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 29729
Received: 10/11/2021
Respondent: Gita Mackintosh
Legally compliant? No
Sound? No
Why build where there is a risk of flooding? This shows infrastructure is not sound.
Why build where there is a risk of flooding? This shows infrastructure is not sound.