Dunton Hills Garden Village Strategic Allocation

Showing comments and forms 61 to 78 of 78

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24265

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Jeffrey Goodwin

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA. It is obvious that Brentwood intends to build a New Town rather than a Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny do not stack up.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DGHV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc.
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NHS; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc.
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon's Infrastructure.
Thereby, all income profits go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood intend to support the development.
However unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers lied when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions appears they do not want General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only waffle.
10. Brentwood Council admit unable to supply Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently only their thinking, ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the council have admitted have not carry out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised wish built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT UNDERSTAND MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN FUTURE!

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood intends to build a New Town rather than a Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny do not stack up.
Have requested information NOW so have time to check the facts and stop this unethical development in its tracks, unless the council can supply accurate documentation which stands up to scrutiny!
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely

Jeffrey Goodwin

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24272

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

I object to DHGV because Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts area. It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24273

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

I object to DHGV because Brentwood borough Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA. It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up. Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24274

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

I object to DHGV because Brentwood residents want development in north of the borough, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24275

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

I object to DHGV because Brentwood residents want development in north of the borough as these areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24276

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

I object to DHGV because Brentwood residents want development in north of the borough as easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24278

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free. You will not be providing any funding for anything. Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NHS; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV form plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24279

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The councils lack of professionalism is certainly outstanding, as no-one can trust your facts without checking. For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle visit WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24280

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Brentwood describe Dunton as: - (A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District & (B) importantly describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem). Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24281

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

NEW TOWN: Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24282

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

The costs to ensure no problems at DHGV alone means site is unviable but then Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon's Infrastructure. Thereby, all income profits go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Council and its Residents. For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24283

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Brentwood Council now advise after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood intend to support the development. However unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24284

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

[The plan] Again proves that the Planning Department officers lied when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged. Appears council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known. From their actions appears they do not want General Public or Residents to obtain information.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24285

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only waffle. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24286

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Brentwood Council admit unable to supply Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently only their thinking, ifs/maybes and may never be built. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the council have admitted have not carry out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24288

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', so how can anyone accurately comment? What are the facts and which are fiction! Have requested information NOW so have time to check the facts and stop this unethical development in its tracks, unless the council can supply accurate documentation which stands up to scrutiny!

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24289

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Factual information has been rigged / amended, given a different slant / representation by Brentwood Council. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose. VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised wish built in current planning period. (16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches). But understand may well double in size in future.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.

Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24290

Received: 28/05/2019

Respondent: Mr Max Aitkins

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA. It is obvious that Brentwood intends to build a New Town rather than a Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny do not stack up.

Change suggested by respondent:

Remove DHGV from plan

Full text:

Dear Sir/Madam,

Brentwood Councils Local Plan
& re Dunton Hills Garden Village

I object to DUNTON HILLS GARDEN VILLAGE (DHGV) for the following reasons: -
BRENTWOOD RESIDENTS WANT DEVELOPMENT IN NORTH OF THE BOROUGH, North Brentwood, Pilgrims Hatch and Greenfield sites North of A12 to keep families together and to provide Affordable/Social Housing.
Easy to build and have major new roads e.g. to M25 and others upgraded etc..
These areas have superb Infrastructure, Air Quality and other major benefits.

PLEASE NOTE:
The council state nothing is your problem to confirm is safe & risk free.
You will not be providing any funding for anything.
Infrastructure is always someone else's problem: NH'S; Essex County Council, Bus Companies, C2C's etc..
ALSO THE COUNCILS LACK OF PROFESSIONALISM IS CERTAINLY OUTSTANDING, as no-one can trust your facts without checking.
For better information and accurate facts, rather than Brentwood Councils waffle VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK
1. THE COSTS TO ENSURE NO PROBLEMS AT DHGV alone means site UNVIABLE BUT THEN Brentwood's Political Bias & Greed takes over (see point 4).
2. Brentwood describe Dunton as: -
(A) Considered Outside of Brentwood's District
&
(B) IMPORTANTLY describe it as Fenland (Meaning low marshy area & together with their reports likely to Flood/Have Surface Water besides Soil & Water Contamination besides the Major Gas Pipe-Line but state is not Brentwood Councils problem ).
Is actually the worst site considered (which is a critical drainage area) confirming is unsuitable for development but considers is the most profitable and keeps residents out of Brentwood's main area.
3. (NEW TOWN) Currently reported 4,000 New Homes, in their January 2018 Local Plan (as advised intend to bring forward further proposed development and then increased further as understand site could double in size as far more land available to them).
4. DHGV is quoted as a self-sufficient site; however, Brentwood's Director of Strategic Planning has stated will rely on Basildon' Infrastructure.
By relying on Basildon's infrastructure all income profits from DHGV will go to Brentwood Council and year on year maintenance costs and problems fall on Basildon Borough Council and its Residents.
For Brentwood Council is a WIN - WIN situation: will receive over £36,000,000 from government and vast council tax with little outlay.
5. Brentwood Council is aware their Local Plan (at least in part) especially regarding DHGV is unsound.
6. Brentwood Council NOW ADVISE after over 4 years is producing an Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) which will provide an overview of the infrastructure requirements associated with the Local Plan and how Brentwood Council intend to support the development.
However the Council is unable to supply any information to back the IDP comment!
Again proves that the Planning Department officers misrepresented the truth when supplying information and why unable to answer simple basic questions.
7. It appears the council deliberately want to proceed even though the facts quoted cannot be factually backed up as currently appear flawed and rigged.
8. Appears Brentwood Council and the Council Leader, Louise Mckinley are trying their utmost to push through DHGV, without proper scrutiny, as concerned would not be passed by Planning Inspectorate if actual facts known.
From their actions it appears they do not want the General Public or Residents to obtain information.
9. Brentwood Council including Planning and Louise McKinley, council leader, unable to answer relevant questions with factual information, only confuscation
10. Brentwood Council admit to being unable to supply a Masterplan or what Infrastructure will actually be provided (and have lied about for over 4 years) as is currently their only thinking, consisting of ifs/maybes and may never be built.
11. Brentwood Council and the council leader are deliberately not responding to outstanding questions or emails (some nearly 2 months, well overdue through an associated source) as appear extremely concerned that then could easily prove Reports have been Fabricated/Manipulated to misrepresent the best areas for development and in fact where the best areas are.
12. E.g. Brentwood Council dismissed building 2,300 New Homes at Pilgrims Hatch for reasons given, however, the same and worse applies to Dunton.
13. All consultations on Brentwood Councils Local Plan, have been bought into disrepute as no-one knows the real details/facts on the various proposed sites as Brentwood Council 'Keep On Moving The Goalposts', SO HOW CAN ANYONE ACCURATELY COMMENT!
What are the facts and which are fiction!
14. In the submission for the £528,000 grant, listed 10 Key Milestones to be completed by October 2018, yet the Council have admitted they have not carried out any, so how can Brentwood Council be trusted.
15. FACTUAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN RIGGED/AMENDED, GIVEN A DIFFERENT SLANT/REPRESENTATION by Brentwood Council.
16. There are more points but this is enough for now, without listing them all.
BRENTWOOD COUNCIL ARE LIKE THE PROVERB, 'A ROLLING STONE GATHERS NO MOSS', thereby they change details/comments at whim to whatever suits their purpose.

VISIT WWW.DUNTONEXPLOITATION.CO.UK FOR MORE ACCURATE INFORMATION
Brentwood Councils Local Plan, January 2018, shows 4,000 New Homes and advised their wish list is built in current planning period.
(16,000 people and 8,000 vehicles besides over 30+ Travellers/Gypsy pitches).
BUT I UNDERSTAND THAT THIS MAY WELL DOUBLE SIZE IN THE FUTURE!

Brentwood Council intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious what Brentwood Council intend to the detriment of the adjacent Basildon Borough Council.

Intend to build well over 50% of their New Homes target (appears nearly 65%), SOUTH of the A127 which they consider OUTSIDE of Brentwood Districts AREA.
It is obvious that Brentwood Council intends to build a New Town rather than a Garden Village and will use every means at their disposal to build DHGV even though; the Local Development Plans details after scrutiny, do not stack up.
Brentwood Council's Local Development Plan will heavily impact on my life and more detailed structure including Infrastructure should be formalised prior to introduction.
Please acknowledge receipt.
I look forward to hearing from you.