022 Land at Honeypot Lane, Brentwood
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20209
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mrs Madden
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20210
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mrs Madden
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20247
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Ms Caroline Nuttall
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20248
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Ms Caroline Nuttall
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20249
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Ms Caroline Nuttall
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20250
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Ms Caroline Nuttall
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20251
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Ms Caroline Nuttall
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20252
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Ms Caroline Nuttall
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20253
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Tony Lilley
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20254
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Tony Lilley
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20255
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Tony Lilley
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20256
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Tony Lilley
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20257
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Tony Lilley
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20258
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Tony Lilley
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20259
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Ron Schild
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20260
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Ron Schild
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20261
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Ron Schild
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20262
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Ron Schild
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20263
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Ron Schild
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20264
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Ron Schild
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20265
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Andrew & Janette Davison
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20266
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Andrew & Janette Davison
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20267
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Andrew & Janette Davison
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20268
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Andrew & Janette Davison
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20269
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Andrew & Janette Davison
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20270
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr. & Mrs. Andrew & Janette Davison
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20271
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr & Miss D J Carter-Barnard & D Skurr
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20272
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr & Miss D J Carter-Barnard & D Skurr
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20273
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr & Miss D J Carter-Barnard & D Skurr
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20274
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr & Miss D J Carter-Barnard & D Skurr
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.