022 Land at Honeypot Lane, Brentwood
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20695
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Chris Howe
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20696
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Chris Howe
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20697
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Lee and Rachel O'Meara
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20698
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Lee and Rachel O'Meara
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20699
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Lee and Rachel O'Meara
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20700
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Lee and Rachel O'Meara
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20701
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Lee and Rachel O'Meara
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20702
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr & Mrs Lee and Rachel O'Meara
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20703
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr James Straker
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20704
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr James Straker
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20705
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr James Straker
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20706
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr James Straker
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20707
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr James Straker
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20708
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr James Straker
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20709
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Philip Beare
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20710
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Philip Beare
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20711
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Philip Beare
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20712
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Philip Beare
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20713
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Philip Beare
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20714
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Mr Philip Beare
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20715
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Lloyd Hayden
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20716
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Lloyd Hayden
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20717
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Lloyd Hayden
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20718
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Lloyd Hayden
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20719
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Lloyd Hayden
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20720
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Lloyd Hayden
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20721
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Ms Linda Hayden
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20722
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Ms Linda Hayden
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20723
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Ms Linda Hayden
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Representation ID: 20724
Received: 04/06/2018
Respondent: Ms Linda Hayden
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
I am writing to object to the inclusion of the Honeypot Lane site (022) being included in the Local Development Plan.
1. The traffic caused by 200 extra houses plus a care home would cause a dramatic increase in traffic in all the local roads. Traffic at peak times is already very heavy and causes long tail backs at all junctions leading onto London Road. Honeypot Lane is already a cut-through from London Road to Weald Road and traffic still speeds through the road ignoring the 20 mph speed limit. There would be major problems with traffic wherever the entrance to the site was located. All adjacent roads and Homesteads Estate would become a traffic 'rat run'. There are many safety risks and extra pollution.
2. This is important Metropolitan Green Belt land and I feel strongly that such land should be protected.
3. Local schools and doctors surgeries have no capacity to support the additional residents.
4. Site was previously rejected as it did not meet the Council's Spatial Strategy - nothing has changed.
5. The development would cause flooding and drainage problems in the area. The gardens in some houses backing onto the site already experience problems.
6. This is not a good choice for such a development. A deeply flawed plan.
Please take my views into consideration.