What is a Spatial Strategy?

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Object

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 14758

Received: 21/04/2016

Respondent: Mr David Harman

Representation Summary:

No account is being taken of infrastructional requirements that such huge growth implies. Health care, in hospital, care home or at home, are at present nadequate; they would collapse if such an increase in loading were applied. Public transport throughout the Borough is vestiginal at best, it could not be grown to even begin to address the enormous growth envisaged. There is no provision for (nor any recognition of) other than primary education for our children.

Full text:

Sirs, The published version of the LDP is unacceptable for a number of reasons:
1. The housing need, forming the basis of the Plan, vastly exceeds Brentwood's actual requirement.
2. No account is being taken of infrastructional requirements that such huge growth implies.
3. The traffic growth implications of the plans are not considered.
4. Health care, in hospital, care home or at home, are at present inadequate; they would collapse if such an increase in loading were applied.
5. Public transport throughout the Borough is vestiginal at best, it could not be grown to even begin to address the enormous growth envisaged.
6. There is no provision for (nor any recognition of) other than primary education for our children.
7. There is no apparent recognition that the projected growth in housing and industrial premises south of the A127 would present a huge north to south
shift in the balance of population of the Borough. The A128 would provide the only significant link between north and south. At present this road is over
whelmed during both morning and evening "rush hours". The additional load would cause permanent gridlock.
Please take these vital issues into account.

Object

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 14759

Received: 21/04/2016

Respondent: Mr David Harman

Representation Summary:

There is no apparent recognition that the projected growth in housing and industrial premises south of the A127 would present a huge north to south shift in the balance of population of the Borough. The A128 would provide the only significant link between north and south. At present this road is over whelmed during both morning and evening "rush hours". The additional load would cause permanent gridlock.

Full text:

Sirs, The published version of the LDP is unacceptable for a number of reasons:
1. The housing need, forming the basis of the Plan, vastly exceeds Brentwood's actual requirement.
2. No account is being taken of infrastructional requirements that such huge growth implies.
3. The traffic growth implications of the plans are not considered.
4. Health care, in hospital, care home or at home, are at present inadequate; they would collapse if such an increase in loading were applied.
5. Public transport throughout the Borough is vestiginal at best, it could not be grown to even begin to address the enormous growth envisaged.
6. There is no provision for (nor any recognition of) other than primary education for our children.
7. There is no apparent recognition that the projected growth in housing and industrial premises south of the A127 would present a huge north to south
shift in the balance of population of the Borough. The A128 would provide the only significant link between north and south. At present this road is over
whelmed during both morning and evening "rush hours". The additional load would cause permanent gridlock.
Please take these vital issues into account.

Object

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 16963

Received: 01/06/2016

Respondent: Ms Linda Campbell

Representation Summary:

OUR SERVICES ARE UNDER STRAIN & FULL TO BURSTING=SCHOOLS -GP SURGERIES-HOSPITALS=BLACK ALERT.
NO EVIDENCE OF NEEDING THIS HOUSING.
EMPTY PROPERTIES ALREADY WHY BUILD MORE
NO NEED FOR LDP [PROOF?]

Full text:

GREENBELT SHOULD NOT BE BUILT ON AT ALL EVER
OUR SERVICES ARE UNDER STRAIN & FULL TO BURSTING=SCHOOLS -GP SURGERIES-HOSPITALS=BLACK ALERT.
NO EVIDENCE OF NEEDING THIS HOUSING.
EMPTY PROPERTIES ALREADY WHY BUILD MORE
NO NEED FOR LDP [PROOF?]
MORE POLLUITION NOT WANTED OR NEEDED
THE ORIGINAL CONSULTATION WAS FLAWED & SHOULD HAVE BEEN NULL & VOID AS RESIDENTS COMPLETELY UNINFORMED