Green Belt

Showing comments and forms 1 to 3 of 3

Support

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 13405

Received: 17/03/2016

Respondent: Mrs Jean Laut

Representation Summary:

Green Belt isn't just the wide open fields but the little pockets between existing houses.

No infill should be allowed until every scrap of brown field has been used. The developers obviously find greenfield easier to develop than brown. They must be prevented from using greenfield.

Full text:

Green belt isn't just the wide open fields but the little pockets between existin houses.

No infill should be allowed until every scrap of brown field has been used. The developers obviously find green easier to develop than brown. They must be prevented from using green.

Comment

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 13663

Received: 23/03/2016

Respondent: Mr Sasha Millwood

Representation Summary:

The green belt is more than just a "valuable" asset -- it is indispensible, and I would like my local Council to prioritise its preservation above all else. The constraints to "development opportunities" are eminently a price worth paying. Genuine "development needs" can be met through regulated use of brownfield sites in town centres -- the Council must not acquiesce to developers' desire for the greater profits arising from greenfield development. The whole point of the green belt is for it to be permanent and open; not chipped away gradually and insidiously in every planning cycle.

Full text:

The green belt is more than just a "valuable" asset -- it is indispensible, and I would like my local Council to prioritise its preservation above all else. The constraints to "development opportunities" are eminently a price worth paying. Genuine "development needs" can be met through regulated use of brownfield sites in town centres -- the Council must not acquiesce to developers' desire for the greater profits arising from greenfield development. The whole point of the green belt is for it to be permanent and open; not chipped away gradually and insidiously in every planning cycle.

Object

Draft Local Plan

Representation ID: 14692

Received: 20/04/2016

Respondent: Mr Trevor Richmond

Representation Summary:

2.61 Green Belt: The plan states the need to protect the asset of the Green Belt, which I support fully, yet proposes building on this. In particular the areas along the A12 corridor where their are protect species of wildlife living.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments: