Policy CP16: Enjoyable and Quality Public Realm

Showing comments and forms 1 to 7 of 7

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 70

Received: 09/09/2013

Respondent: Mr Stephen Priddle

Representation Summary:

But I hope NPPF 70 will be heeded, particularly allowing for community meeting places and small local shops in new developments

Full text:

But I hope NPPF 70 will be heeded, particularly allowing for community meeting places and small local shops in new developments

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 389

Received: 02/10/2013

Respondent: JTS Partnership LLP

Representation Summary:

We consider that this policy should be reworded. Whilst no objection is raised, in principle, to any of the matters to which it relates, only larger development schemes will need to, and will be capable of, addressing all the matters set out therein. As currently drafted, the policy applies to "all new developmentā€Ÿ, whether it is a strategic site or a small scale extension to an existing property.

Full text:

see attached

Attachments:

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 461

Received: 02/10/2013

Respondent: Sans Souci Enterprises Limited

Agent: JTS Partnership LLP

Representation Summary:

It is considered that this policy should be reworded as, whilst no objection, in principle is raised to any of the matters to which it relates, only larger development schemes will need to, and will be capable of, addressing all the matters set out therein. As currently drafted, the Policy applies to "all new developmentā€Ÿ, whether it is a strategic site or a small scale extension to an existing property. Accordingly, the second sentence of the policy should be redrafted as per attached.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Object

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 528

Received: 02/10/2013

Respondent: Ursuline Sisters

Agent: JTS Partnership LLP

Representation Summary:

The Company considers that this policy should be reworded. As currently drafted, the Policy applies to "all new development", whether it is a strategic site or a small scale extension to an existing property. Accordingly, the second sentence of the policy should be re-drafted to read:- New development must be based on a thorough site and contextual appraisal, which is appropriate to the form, nature and scale of the development being proposed, and it should be sensitive to its context, and where appropriate, incorporate: ..."

Full text:

See Attached

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 713

Received: 02/10/2013

Respondent: CLM Ltd

Agent: JTS Partnership LLP

Representation Summary:

The Company considers that this policy should be reworded. Whilst no objection, in principle, is raised to any of the matters to which it relates, only larger development schemes will need to, and will be capable of, addressing all the matters set out therein. As such the second sentence of the policy should be re-drafted to read:-
New development must be based on a thorough site and contextual appraisal, which is appropriate to the form, nature and scale of the development being proposed, and it should be sensitive to its context, and where appropriate, incorporate:

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Comment

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 970

Received: 02/10/2013

Respondent: Natural England

Representation Summary:

The Council and developers should consider the provision of 'soft landscaping' as part of new development proposals, providing multifunctional benefits as mentioned above.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments:

Support

Local Plan 2015-2030 Preferred Options for Consultation

Representation ID: 1899

Received: 24/10/2013

Respondent: Historic England

Representation Summary:

We welcome this policy.

Full text:

See attached

Attachments: