Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 9687
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr Elliot Sutton
Sewage (Q3).
Q1: Yes - Gypsy and traveller sites should not be considered, initial illegality on Green Belt land should not be rewarded.
Q2: The infrastructure is incapable of supporting a lot of additional housing. Apart from roads, schools, doctors parking etc. There is a serious problem with sewage.
Q3: No - Overbuilding in the area. The sewage floods frequently (See Anglia Water compliant reference 50453314). It bubbled out many times in 2014 along footpath 37.
Q5: No - The Green Belt should be preserved at all costs.
Q6: Only brownfield.
Q7: Most people in Ingatestone commute to London.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: No.
Q10:
Scenic Beauty: 5
Outdoor Recreation/ Leisure Use: 3
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11:
Houses: 4
Commercial/Industrial buildings: 2
Nature Reserves/Wildlife: 3
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 3
Degraded/ Derelict/ Waste land: 2
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure/ Recreation Facilities: 2
Q12: Sewage (Q3)
Q13: Parking, sewage , doctors, schools.