Support
Strategic Growth Options
Representation ID: 8841
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: Mr PJ Backhouse-Jaques
Yes. Brentwood is a good place to live. Brentwood does not need more houses.
Q1: No. I object to any building on Green Belt.
Q2: No.
Q3: Yes. It is ok to build old factory sites. Do not build on Green Belt.
Q4: A127 is very busy. More houses will create more gridlock.
Q5: No. Not if this means building on Green Belt.
Q6: Most of these houses what not be for people in Brentwood.
Q7: No. Brentwood has high levels of work.
Q8: Yes.
Q9: Yes.
Q10: Scenic Beauty Attractiveness: 5
Outdoor Recreation / Leisure Use: 4
Wildlife Interest: 5
Historic Interest: 4
Tranquility: 5
Q11: Houses: 3
Commercial / Industrial Buildings: 1
Nature Reserves / Wildlife: 4
Farmland: 4
Woodland: 4
Degraded / Derelict / Waste Land: 1
Infrastructure: 3
Leisure / Recreation Facilities: 3
Q12: Yes. Brentwood is a good place to live. Brentwood does not need more houses.