Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 30226
Received: 01/12/2021
Respondent: St Modwen Properties PLC and S&J Padfield and Partners
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
Legally compliant? Yes
Sound? No
Representation Summary:
Whilst the caveat proposed within MM7, referring to the need to comply with legal tests (i.e. the CIL Regulations) is welcomed, the tying of the contributions to the Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) is considered to be somewhat problematic as: a) the IDP to be a ‘live’ document and therefore subject to change; and
b) the IDP is not subject to a level of scrutiny to ensure that the contributions it demands are justified and viable, in the same way that a Local Plan or CIL Charging Schedule would be. Suggest reference to the IDP is moved to the supporting text.
Full text:
See attached