Object
Schedule of Potential Main Modifications
Representation ID: 30155
Received: 30/11/2021
Respondent: S&J Padfield and Partners (SJP)
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Representation Summary:
Proposed change requires contributions to infrastructure “as set out in the Infrastructure Delivery Plan…where such contributions are compliant with national policy and the legal tests’;
The tying of contributions to the IDP is considered somewhat problematic as it is a live document subject to change; and the IDP is not subject to a level of scrutiny to ensure the contributions it demands are justified, reasonable and viable, in the same way a Local Plan or CIL Charging Schedule would be.
Full text:
See attached