Object
Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)
Representation ID: 25532
Received: 19/03/2019
Respondent: Mr. James Simpson
Legally compliant? Not specified
Sound? No
Duty to co-operate? Not specified
Section 09 Policy R25 - 9.197-9.200; Policy R26, 9.201-9.205:
Section 4 Policy SP01-D(a) D (f) Para 4.9,4.2; Policy SP02
Section 8: Policy NE 06, 8.5-8.64 - para 8.85 (iv), 8.90, 8.101; Policy NE13
As a local teacher I worry about the impact on local infrastructure that is already struggling. Schools, doctors, buses, roads. Blackmore is an isolated village with modest services that cannot cope with further pressure on the services. There needs to be a housing needs survey. Brownfield sites should be used. Access from/to red Rose lane is unsuitable for the volume of traffic; the village is prone to flooding and when it does Red Rose land is the only way through the village - if there are homes built will this increase the flooding? There is no clear strategy for BBC on this proposal.
Both sites R25 and R26 should be removed from the LDP. Planners should look at the BVHA neighbourhood plan which clearly states the housing needs of the local community. Green Belt land should not be built on when brownfield sites are available. Housing needs survey should be done.
Both sites R25 and R26 should be removed from the LDP. Planners should look at the BVHA neighbourhood plan which clearly states the housing needs of the local community. Green Belt land should not be built on when brownfield sites are available. Housing needs survey should be done.
Refer to attached form