Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 25037

Received: 19/03/2019

Respondent: Ms Jill Griffiths

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

1. Building on greenbelt; 2. Infrastructure of school, surgery, parking, drainage; 3. Lack of consultation re local needs; 4. Local wildlife habitat leading to more flooding because of habitat removal; 5. Impact from top of Fingrith Hall Lane!!! Epping Borough. 6. More traffic pollution, risk of road accidents increases could lead to injury and deaths; 7. Local shop couldn't cope with the extra load; 8. Village will end up being part of London sprawl; 9. The profound historical nature and heritage will be deeply impacts; 10. Blackmore be a 'through' way / short cut from Red Rose at top of Fingrith Hall Road.

Change suggested by respondent:

1. I would like the proposed sites R25 and R26 removed from local development plan. 2. Consult the BVHA neighbourhood plan for sustainable development. 3. Why doesn't Brentwood Council lead the way to protect green belt and historical heritage sites - Blackmore at the top of the list. 4. Green alternative use to those sites eg allotments, solar panels on both to serve the village.

Full text:

1. Building on greenbelt; 2. Infrastructure of school, surgery, parking, drainage; 3. Lack of consultation re local needs; 4. Local wildlife habitat leading to more flooding because of habitat removal; 5. Impact from top of Fingrith Hall Lane!!! Epping Borough. 6. More traffic pollution, risk of road accidents increases could lead to injury and deaths; 7. Local shop couldn't cope with the extra load; 8. Village will end up being part of London sprawl; 9. The profound historical nature and heritage will be deeply impacts; 10. Blackmore be a 'through' way / short cut from Red Rose at top of Fingrith Hall Road.

Attachments: