Object

Brentwood Local Plan 2016 - 2033 (Pre-Submission, Regulation 19)

Representation ID: 24907

Received: 19/03/2019

Respondent: Jacqueline Greagsby

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Duty to co-operate? Not specified

Representation Summary:

1. Red Rose Lane is not suitable for urban development, Blackmore has modest services and infrastructure which are failing with the existing population. 2. Access to/from Red Rose Lane is unsustainable for the volume of traffic. 3. Red Rose Lane is prone to flooding and any construction on this site could push the problem onto current residents property.

Change suggested by respondent:

Sites R25 and R26 should be removed from the LDP and that planners should refer to the BVHA "neighbourhood plan" which clearly sets out the local planning needs for our already sustainable community.

Full text:

1. Red Rose Lane is not suitable for urban development, Blackmore has modest services and infrastructure which are failing with the existing population. 2. Access to/from Red Rose Lane is unsustainable for the volume of traffic. 3. Red Rose Lane is prone to flooding and any construction on this site could push the problem onto current residents property.

Attachments: