Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Search representations
Results for S & J Padfield and Partners search
New searchSupport
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
An Evolving Evidence Base
Representation ID: 19784
Received: 12/03/2018
Respondent: S & J Padfield and Partners
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
Welcome the view proposed by the SA which supports "realisation of opportunities for the A127 corridor to develop as an employment cluster".
Support
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
101C and 101D Codham Hall
Representation ID: 19785
Received: 12/03/2018
Respondent: S & J Padfield and Partners
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
The supporting report prepared by Liz Lake Associates demonstrates that the site at Codham North does not presently positively contribute towards Green Belt purposes.
Support
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
101C and 101D Codham Hall
Representation ID: 19786
Received: 12/03/2018
Respondent: S & J Padfield and Partners
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
In order to allow for landscape and enabling works to support employment delivery it is considered important that both sites 101C and 101D are removed from the green belt in their entirety. On this basis, it is considered more appropriate to include the site as a single reference within the final submission plan.
