Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Search representations
Results for Diocese of Chelmsford search
New searchComment
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Spatial Strategy
Representation ID: 19818
Received: 12/03/2018
Respondent: Diocese of Chelmsford
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
Object to the decision to discount site 033 due to availability and heritage impact. Site is located directly adjacent to a built-up area of Hutton, relates well to the spatial strategy. The SHLAA 2011 states that site is suitable, available, achievable, and could deliver 13 dwellings, within 1-5 years. The SA indicates that the allocation of site 033 would have positive effects in relation to the SA objectives, although it also states that site performs poorly ('Red') against Conservation Area criterion. This is a blanket assessment based purely on the fact that it is located within Hutton Village Conservation Area.
See attached.
Object
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
An Evolving Evidence Base
Representation ID: 19820
Received: 12/03/2018
Respondent: Diocese of Chelmsford
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
The Sustainability Appraisal, through its analyses states that site 033 performs poorly ('Red') against Conservation Area criterion. Again, this is a blanket assessment based purely on the fact that the site is located within the Hutton Village Conservation Area. This is considered arbitrary. It is considered that a high quality residential development scheme on the scale proposed could be accommodated within the site without adversely impacting on the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. Suggest the Sustainability Appraisal is amended to acknowledge that depending on implementation the site will not adversely impact in this regard.
See attached.
Comment
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Housing Need
Representation ID: 19821
Received: 12/03/2018
Respondent: Diocese of Chelmsford
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
Generally support the increased housing target as it confirms to the Government's objectives to increase housing supply. However, concern that the housing target does not properly represent the full extent of housing need: the reduction of stated needs of 348 dpa to 280 dpa based on tests of underlying trends. Suggest that using 348 dpa as a baseline before applying the proposed 36% increase would be a more appropriate methodology. This would result in a housing need of 473 dpa or 9,466 over 20 year. This also reflects the projections emerging from the government proposed standard housing needs methodology.
See attached.
Comment
Preferred Site Allocations 2018
Housing Supply
Representation ID: 19825
Received: 12/03/2018
Respondent: Diocese of Chelmsford
Agent: Strutt & Parker LLP
To ensure the plan is fully robust we suggest it is important to plan for higher level of growth. Additionally in order to ensure delivery throughout the plan period it is important the supply includes sufficient sites that are deliverable in the early part of the plan period in addition to any strategic or new settlement allocations.
See attached.