Preferred Site Allocations 2018

Search representations

Results for Rochford District Council search

New search New search

Comment

Preferred Site Allocations 2018

Strategic Objectives

Representation ID: 19952

Received: 14/03/2018

Respondent: Rochford District Council

Representation Summary:

The Council supports Brentwood's identified strategic objectives, in principle,
however would like to highlight the need to ensure that the impacts of the planned
growth and wider strategy on other authorities in South Essex, including Rochford
District, are considered in detail. It is expected that the collaborative work currently
being undertaken at the sub-regional level, which includes both Rochford District
Council and Brentwood Borough Council, will help to facilitate these cross-boundary
considerations.

Support

Preferred Site Allocations 2018

Housing Need

Representation ID: 19953

Received: 14/03/2018

Respondent: Rochford District Council

Representation Summary:

supports, in principle, approach to meeting housing needs, but would like to raise the need to consider the impact of its proposed housing allocations within the wider context of South Essex. This is particularly pertinent in relation to the Dunton Hills garden village which could potentially be sited close to other proposed housing locations in the neighbouring authorities of Basildon and Thurrock. RDC would advocate a joined-up approach to fully consider the potential impacts of this growth, and would like to highlight the need for BBC to consider the impacts of this growth on the authorities beyond its boundaries.

Support

Preferred Site Allocations 2018

Specialist Accommodation Needs

Representation ID: 19954

Received: 14/03/2018

Respondent: Rochford District Council

Representation Summary:

Rochford District Council supports Brentwood's approach to meeting its Gypsy and
Traveller accommodation needs in full and continues to support the close working of the Essex Planning Officer's Association towards effective planning for Gypsy and Traveller provision into the future across Essex.

Comment

Preferred Site Allocations 2018

Infrastructure Planning

Representation ID: 19955

Received: 14/03/2018

Respondent: Rochford District Council

Representation Summary:

Rochford District Council raises no objection to Brentwood's approach to infrastructure planning at this time but would like to highlight the need to carefully consider the impact of planned growth on the A127, A130 and A13, which all form part of the strategic road network for South Essex. The Council highlights the need to consider the impact of developments on these roads, as well as the wider strategic network, and would support further exploration of the mitigation and improvement measures needed to make such growth sustainable. The impact of the Lower Thames Crossing proposals should also be considered.

Comment

Preferred Site Allocations 2018

Economic Prosperity

Representation ID: 19956

Received: 14/03/2018

Respondent: Rochford District Council

Representation Summary:

Rochford District Council raises no objection to Brentwood's approach to economic development and growth but would highlight the need to carefully consider the impact of the planned growth on neighbouring authorities and the strategic highway network. Again, the Council would support further exploration of the mitigation and improvement measures needed to make such growth sustainable.

Comment

Preferred Site Allocations 2018

An Evolving Evidence Base

Representation ID: 19957

Received: 14/03/2018

Respondent: Rochford District Council

Representation Summary:

Rochford District Council raises no objection to Brentwood's fulfilment of the Duty to Co-operate, but would highlight the need to continue to work collaboratively with all other South Essex authorities on cross-boundary strategic planning matters, further to the intentions of the South Essex 2050 Memorandum of Understanding.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.