Comment

Representation ID: 16321

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Agent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Para 2.4, 2.7, 9.1, 9.14 state that additional planning documents should only be used when justified however they also state that various strategies have been produced by Essex County Council which will be taken into account and that BBC will designate and keep under review Conservation Areas. We believe that the Borough would be justified in using both the Parish Council Village's Design Statement and the three Conservation Area Appraisals that the ECC carried out on behalf of the BBC and that they should be used to inform the planning process. Their use at this stage should be incorporated into the LDP.

Comment

Representation ID: 16322

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Agent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Para 2.35: With a limited amount of employment land, efforts to convert this for housing should be resisted.

Comment

Representation ID: 16323

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Agent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Sitting of new development in the Ingatestone area will place strain on medical, education, sewage disposal and parking all of which is currently under pressure.
We also concern the potential increase in traffic at the Mountnessing roundabout junction. The problem is of access to the proposed commercial site adjacent to the A12, its slip road and the B1002

Comment

Representation ID: 16324

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Agent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Policy 6.3d states that development should have no unacceptable effect on the environment or amenity. These conditions will be experienced by residents if properties are built on site 079A next to the A12 in Ingatestone as proposed.

Support

Representation ID: 16325

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Agent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Support the need for a higher proportion of 2 bedroom units.

Support

Representation ID: 16326

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Agent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Only support if satisfactory rehousing of the tenants of the sheltered housing complex is arranged and they are able to return after redevelopment if they so wish. Proper negotiation with the affected residents will be essential.

Comment

Representation ID: 16327

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Agent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Concerns of 60 houses proposed on site 128 Ingateston Garden Centre surround sewage disposal capacity and inappropriate development in the Green Belt. The site is only partly developed at present and contains areas of undeveloped land which if developed would impact on the openness contrary to the Green Belt policy.
Development of 42 properties is far from ideal place for people to live and children to grow up in. Air pollution figures obtained for development close to this site required expensive mitigation measures to be taken before planning permission was granted. The atmosphere in this area is not conducive to healthy living and the Council should re-designate the site as being unsuitable for housing.

Support

Representation ID: 16328

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Agent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Strongly support the provision of sufficient high quality affordable housing to meet local needs and unlike those at the True Love site these should be integrated and spread evenly through the site rather than grouped in one area.

Support

Representation ID: 16329

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Agent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Support the change of use of upper floors from commercial to residential use in line with these criteria.

Comment

Representation ID: 16330

Received: 18/05/2016

Respondent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Agent: Ingatestone and Fryerning Parish Council

Para 9.35 we would like to see a statement which says that "the council will introduce a procedure for locally listed buildings of historical and architectural interest which can be quickly triggered should a building of consequence be threatened with demolition". Important buildings have already been lost in our Parish because no local list has been complied and no procedure exists.