Support

Representation ID: 15932

Received: 12/05/2016

Respondent: CALA Homes

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Site 079A does not contribute to any of the five purposes of Green Belts and is fully consistent with both the NPPF and the Council Spatial Strategy which seeks to identify urban extensions in the Green Belt with clear defensible physical boundaries.

Its location is within walking distance of sustainable transport connections and the allocated employment land on site 079C.

Technical work demonstrate that the site can deliver 57 dwellings, higher than identified in the Plan (42 dwellings). For a more efficient use of land, it is entirely appropriate for the site to be a developed at a higher density than 30 dph

Support

Representation ID: 15934

Received: 12/05/2016

Respondent: CALA Homes

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Support the Council's strategy to focus growth in the A12 corridor, which contains the Borough's main settlements.

Support

Representation ID: 15936

Received: 12/05/2016

Respondent: CALA Homes

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Support the identification of Site 079C for employment, this is a particularly suitable location with respect to transport connections, and it will benefit both new and existing residents of Ingatestone with respect to providing jobs and boosting the local economy.

Support

Representation ID: 15943

Received: 12/05/2016

Respondent: CALA Homes

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Agree with this approach. A balance will need to be found when developing the proposals for the site at the planning application stage to ensure that efficient use of land is made to provide a mix of housing on site to meet a range of needs, whilst also delivering a development that is viable and appropriate to the character and context of the site and its surroundings.

Comment

Representation ID: 15948

Received: 12/05/2016

Respondent: CALA Homes

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Agree with the Council's decision to identify the site to come forward in years 1 to 5, which is supported by SHLAA (2011) which identifies that there are no achievability concerns with the site, and no active uses that will affect its availability. In view of this, and the emerging development proposals for the site, we do however consider that the site is capable of delivering homes sooner and at a higher rate than currently anticipated by the Council.

Consider that it is entirely appropriate for the site to be developed at a higher density than 30 dph demonstrating a more efficient use of land. A development of 57 dwellings is considered more appropriate and one supported by the SHMA

Support

Representation ID: 15949

Received: 12/05/2016

Respondent: CALA Homes

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Support the objective of directing growth to the Borough's transport corridors.

Support

Representation ID: 15950

Received: 12/05/2016

Respondent: CALA Homes

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

We support the flexibility to allow higher residential densities in sustainable locations with good public transport accessibility.

Comment

Representation ID: 15951

Received: 12/05/2016

Respondent: CALA Homes

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

A development of 57 dwellings (41 dph) is considered to represent a more appropriate density for Site 079A, taking account of existing development in the local area; the site's sustainability and accessibility and the Council's aspiration to ensure the most efficient use of land is made

Comment

Representation ID: 15952

Received: 12/05/2016

Respondent: CALA Homes

Agent: JB Planning Associates Ltd.

Site 079A is capable of delivering homes sooner and at a higher rate than currently anticipated by the Council.