Draft Local Plan
Search representations
Results for Thurrock Borough Council search
New searchObject
Draft Local Plan
Policy 5.1: Spatial Strategy
Representation ID: 14350
Received: 14/04/2016
Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council
The A127 corridor sits within an important large fenland landscape character area, which extends across part of Brentwood, Havering and Thurrock authorities. The character assessments undertaken for Mid Essex including the Brentwood section do not reflect the importance of this open landscape. This fenland has been recognised by the Thames Chase Heritage Lottery Fund as a 'distinctive landscape character worth conservation' and has been identified by the CPRE as a nationally significant area of tranquillity in the metropolitan greenbelt.
The urban edges of Brentwood and Basildon are set back from the steeper slopes and screened with woodlands from views across the fenland. The settlements of Upminster and South Ockendon are identifiable in distant views to the east and south-east. There are built features within the open fenland character which do not significantly impact the value of the area but may lower the quality or condition of smaller local character area and field by field character assessments. It is highly likely from the outcomes of landscape capacity studies that any development greater than discreet infill plots would significantly harm the landscape character.
Object
Draft Local Plan
Policy 5.1: Spatial Strategy
Representation ID: 14351
Received: 14/04/2016
Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council
The Brentwood section of the Mid Essex Landscape Character Assessment does not assess different scales of development. Furthermore the Mid Essex Landscape Character Assessment Sep 2006: Chris Blandford Associates Section 4 Character of Brentwood Borough description of open views to the south of Horndon Fenland, suggest the negative influence of '"proximity of the area to a landscape which is more influenced by human activity around Thurrock and the Thames Gateway". This description does not properly reflect the character of the extensive fenland which is described in Thurrock Landscape Capacity: March 2005 Chris Blandford Associates as in having a " Rural character" and "Sense of tranquillity due to absence of major roads and built developed".
Object
Draft Local Plan
Policy 5.1: Spatial Strategy
Representation ID: 14352
Received: 14/04/2016
Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council
West Horndon Village retains a rural settlement character in the open landscape despite the relatively modern style of residential buildings and rural-urban fringe clutter that is disproportionate to the scale of the settlement. The east of the village, particularly the north- east, has a more intact and important rural landscape character. The larger fenland landscape character area would be affected by any further development. It is considered that development of the scale of the Dunton Hill Garden Village or Garden Suburb or an extension east of West Horndon will significantly harm the open rural character of the broad fenland and the setting of rolling farmland and wooded hills of Thurrock.
Object
Draft Local Plan
Policy 8.2: Brentwood Enterprise Park
Representation ID: 14355
Received: 14/04/2016
Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council
The Brentwood Plan and supporting evidence identifies the requirement for additional employment land. However it is unclear why the employment sites (Policy 8.2) are proposed in the draft local plan. It is not always the case that employment land should be located at busy junctions or along the A127 corridor where it would add to traffic flows on a road at current capacity. The sites are not located close to existing centres and are without easy access for workers other than by car. Alternative locations and options should be investigated including the A12 corridor possibly as part of edge of settlement expansion and in mixed use schemes.
Object
Draft Local Plan
Policy 5.2: Housing Growth
Representation ID: 14376
Received: 14/04/2016
Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council
Support the approach to provide for the Objectively Assessed Need (OAN) within Brentwood boundary. However it is considered that the current SHMA and evidence base for the OAN needs updating with new population projections as they and the OAN are likely to rise. It is also recognised that further work on the second stage of the SHMA is currently being undertaken to assess affordable housing and specialist housing needs requirements. Updates to both parts of the evidence base may alter the OAN and the overall housing requirement for the plan period and the level of affordable housing.Government should be publishing the 2014 set of sub national population projections (SNPP) in May 2016. It is acknowledged that the dwelling requirement will need to include any shortfall from previous years. The new OAN figure should form the basis upon which to take forward the draft local plan strategy, the policies and site allocations (and should be subject to further consultation).
Object
Draft Local Plan
Policy 5.2: Housing Growth
Representation ID: 14377
Received: 14/04/2016
Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council
The SHMA also defines the housing market area for Brentwood as the borough based on evidence of a high level of self-containment. Government guidance states that SHMA areas are unlikely to reflect borough boundaries unless a high level of containment is demonstrated. Whilst Thurrock is not part of the same SHMA area it is considered the evidence provided for self-containment of the Brentwood SHMA is questionable as it relies on data from a limited period of house moves in the sub-region which may distort the level of self-containment. Also population migration and household data demonstrate significant flows into Brentwood over short and longer periods from London. It is considered the SHMA market area should be reviewed to assess its robustness and spatial geography. The SHMA is also based on the now out of date 2007 SHMA guidance.
Object
Draft Local Plan
Policy 5.2: Housing Growth
Representation ID: 14378
Received: 14/04/2016
Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council
Both the recently published Brentwood SHMA and Economic Future reports will need updating to reflect the new OAN based on 2012 (and 2014) published demographic data. This will especially be the case if the OAN is significantly different from the current assumptions about the level of dwellings required for Brentwood Borough over the plan period.
Object
Draft Local Plan
Policy 7.1: Dunton Hills Garden Village
Representation ID: 14379
Received: 14/04/2016
Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council
Thurrock Council is very concerned about the proposed Dunton Hills Garden Village concept and has fundamental objections on grounds of:
Lack of Technical Evidence
The concept of the Garden Village, a convincing case for a strategic development at this location has not been made and notes that West Horndon has capacity and infrastructure as a reasonable alternative.
Masterplan approach: more evidence should be provided on the suitability of the project as part of the local plan process. Further information on viability; deliverability and phasing; partnership working with other local authorities and developers; infrastructure and public expenditure; road traffic and transport evidence (and mitigation proposals), Green Travel Route; design and layout; is needed.
Green Belt detrimental impacts, significant loss to the openness and strategic function, coalescence, openness.
Detrimental impact ton the landscape at this location, including to settings of historical assets and to existing development.
Unknown impact on Thurrock housing market
SA of Dunton should have a reduced score to reflect the distance that Dunton HGV is from main centres, services and other residents in Brentwood.
Assessment of Potential sites in the Green Belt - Working Draft noted to be site specific and not a Green Belt review.
Object
Draft Local Plan
Policy 7.10: Gypsy and Traveller Provision
Representation ID: 14380
Received: 14/04/2016
Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council
The draft Local Plan recognises the recent changes made to legislation relating to Travellers and states that further work is being carried out to establish the number of Gypsy and Traveller pitches required within the Brentwood area. Thurrock Council is concerned however, that whilst Brentwood's local plan identifies the issues there may be un-met needs arising from neighbouring authorities for the provision to accommodate Gypsies and Travellers, and there is no acknowledgement of this within the Local Plan documents or implications for Duty to Cooperate.
It is considered that local authorities in Essex should acknowledge and have assessed the needs and requirements of Travelling Showpeople in the preparation of their local plans. It is recognised that Travelling Showpeople have become concentrated in a number of local authorities including Thurrock. Thurrock Council would wish to engage under the Duty to Cooperate with other authorities in Essex including Brentwood to ensure that there is appropriate provision for future needs and requirements of Travelling showpeople.
Object
Draft Local Plan
Sustainability Appraisal
Representation ID: 14381
Received: 14/04/2016
Respondent: Thurrock Borough Council
Thurrock Council considers the approach set out in the Interim Sustainabilty Appraisal (SA) is flawed and that a number of assumptions on the way that options have been scored is not supported by the available evidence.
The Interim SA does not adequately include or reflect in paragraph 6.2.9, Thurrock Council's concerns about development focused on the A127 corridor and impact on Green Belt and Landscape. Paragraphs 6.2.11 to 6.2.12 also do not include a reference to Thurrock Council's fundamental concerns about the deliverability, viability and impact on Green Belt and Landscape of the Dunton Garden Suburb.
The SA appraises and scores six options for the location of development with the assumption that most development would be located in one of the locations and with a strategic scale of development. Whilst this may be useful as an initial approach it is considered that actual development may result in a hybrid of such options with development in several key locations but not necessarily the dispersed option or one strategic location. A hybrid option may well moderate the scoring and impact of development in these locations therefore giving more positive scores rather than a large scale concentration of development.
It is noted that further assessment needs to be undertaken of urban extensions around Brentwood. A new option should be considered including development north and east south east of Brentwood/Shenfield. Again this may result in different scores for a Brentwood Town based option. Such an option is likely to give different scores than presented in the report.