Strategic Growth Options

Search representations

Results for Mountnessing Parish Council search

New search New search

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Question 5

Representation ID: 4798

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mountnessing Parish Council

Representation Summary:

MPC recognises the importance of the Parish in respect of the A12 corridor and the limited opportunities for key developments that can make use of the village facilities, bus routes and transport links (including Cross Rail) within the village envelope. Whilst coalescence is an issue for consideration the A12 creates an obvious division between Mountnessing and Ingatestone that prevents them from ever being linked. With this in mind the challenge of coalescence for MPC is seen as the development of the green corridor that separates the urban area of Shenfield from the semi rural areas that surround it. Even though the A12 would still create a break it is felt that developing Officers Meadows would bring Mountnessing into a continuum of building with very little separation from the urban area.

Object

Strategic Growth Options

128 Ingatestone Garden Centre, Roman Road, Ingatestone

Representation ID: 4807

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mountnessing Parish Council

Representation Summary:

MPC does have concerns about one specific site. This relates to the possibility of Ingatestone Garden Centre becoming a residential development. This would add a dense area of dwellings to what is seen more as outer areas of Ingatestone. Such a development would not be close schools, public transport or medical facilities and should not therefore be considered suitable for housing.

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Question 5

Representation ID: 4809

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mountnessing Parish Council

Representation Summary:

MPC would like to ensure that building density, building styles and street scene are considerations that are given a high level of importance in any potential development. MPC will always want to preserve the 'village feel' of Mountnessing and will always strive to make the right recommendations to ensure that we keep the village how residents would like it to be.

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

1.13 Evidence

Representation ID: 4811

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mountnessing Parish Council

Representation Summary:

- Addressing the need for one bedroom social dwellings to allow existing, and mainly, elderly residents to downsize.
-The use of shared ownership/first time buyer initiatives to help young people to get on to the housing ladder.
- Providing for an increase in the number of bungalows which are in demand by the population in general and also by the projected rise in the number of elderly residents.

Comment

Strategic Growth Options

Question 12

Representation ID: 4812

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Mountnessing Parish Council

Representation Summary:

MPC has very serious concerns over developments proceeding with little regard to the impacts they will have on the existing infrastructure. MPC would want to see that the fresh water supply can provide sufficient pressure to all properties and also that sewerage can be properly drained and processed even in times of high demand such as heavy rainfall. Additionally the Education Authority should ensure that there are sufficient school places for all children that move into the area and that there are additional healthcare facilities provided to cover all residents.

For instructions on how to use the system and make comments, please see our help guide.