Support

Representation ID: 4317

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council

Yes, for the purpose of breaking down the analysis into more manageable areas with common features the three broad areas chosen are sensible.

Comment

Representation ID: 4320

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council

Yes but with reservations:
A "North of the Borough" - brownfield land that is not also greenbelt should be released. Releasing greenbelt land that has been allowed to become derilect land should not be allowed as this will encourage mis-use of land. Moreover, the 2013 SA shows that "North of the Borough" has water and sewerage shortages as well as a poor road infrastructure.

Comment

Representation ID: 4321

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council

Yes with reservations.
B The A12 corridor has the best road and rail access of all the communities and is best suited for expansion without changing the character of the area significantly.

Comment

Representation ID: 4322

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council

Yes with reservations.
C Disagree that the A127 has more scope for development than the A12. The A12 needs significant improvement as this NE segment of the London motorway network is the only key compass direction out of London without a motorway route.

Comment

Representation ID: 4323

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council

The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever. Moreover the road access to sites 143, 224, 070 and 185 is too limited to enable significant development and would create significant addition vehicular traffic on existing minor roads to the detriment of existing residents. Site 019 already has a residence (All Saints Church Rectory) on it.

Comment

Representation ID: 4324

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council

Yes. The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever.

Site 019 already has a residence (All Saints Church Rectory) on it.

Object

Representation ID: 4325

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council

Yes. The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever. Moreover the road access to sites143, 224, 070 and 185 is too limited to enable significant development and would create significant addition vehicular traffic on existing minor roads to the detriment of existing residents.

Object

Representation ID: 4327

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council

Yes. The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever. Moreover the road access to sites143, 224, 070 and 185 is too limited to enable significant development and would create significant addition vehicular traffic on existing minor roads to the detriment of existing residents.

Object

Representation ID: 4328

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council

Yes. The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever. Moreover the road access to sites143, 224, 070 and 185 is too limited to enable significant development and would create significant addition vehicular traffic on existing minor roads to the detriment of existing residents.

Object

Representation ID: 4329

Received: 13/02/2015

Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council

Yes. The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever. Moreover the road access to sites143, 224, 070 and 185 is too limited to enable significant development and would create significant addition vehicular traffic on existing minor roads to the detriment of existing residents.