Strategic Growth Options
Search representations
Results for Doddinghurst Parish Council search
New searchSupport
Strategic Growth Options
Question 1
Representation ID: 4317
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council
Yes, for the purpose of breaking down the analysis into more manageable areas with common features the three broad areas chosen are sensible.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 2
Representation ID: 4320
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council
Yes but with reservations:
A "North of the Borough" - brownfield land that is not also greenbelt should be released. Releasing greenbelt land that has been allowed to become derilect land should not be allowed as this will encourage mis-use of land. Moreover, the 2013 SA shows that "North of the Borough" has water and sewerage shortages as well as a poor road infrastructure.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 2
Representation ID: 4321
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council
Yes with reservations.
B The A12 corridor has the best road and rail access of all the communities and is best suited for expansion without changing the character of the area significantly.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 2
Representation ID: 4322
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council
Yes with reservations.
C Disagree that the A127 has more scope for development than the A12. The A12 needs significant improvement as this NE segment of the London motorway network is the only key compass direction out of London without a motorway route.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 6
Representation ID: 4323
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council
The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever. Moreover the road access to sites 143, 224, 070 and 185 is too limited to enable significant development and would create significant addition vehicular traffic on existing minor roads to the detriment of existing residents. Site 019 already has a residence (All Saints Church Rectory) on it.
see attached
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
019 Land at the Rectory, Church Lane, Doddinghurst
Representation ID: 4324
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council
Yes. The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever.
Site 019 already has a residence (All Saints Church Rectory) on it.
see attached
Object
Strategic Growth Options
070 Land adjacent to St. Margaret's Church, Doddinghurst
Representation ID: 4325
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council
Yes. The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever. Moreover the road access to sites143, 224, 070 and 185 is too limited to enable significant development and would create significant addition vehicular traffic on existing minor roads to the detriment of existing residents.
see attached
Object
Strategic Growth Options
143 Land East of Peartree Lane and North of Peartree Close
Representation ID: 4327
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council
Yes. The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever. Moreover the road access to sites143, 224, 070 and 185 is too limited to enable significant development and would create significant addition vehicular traffic on existing minor roads to the detriment of existing residents.
see attached
Object
Strategic Growth Options
185 Land at Rectory Chase, Doddinghurst
Representation ID: 4328
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council
Yes. The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever. Moreover the road access to sites143, 224, 070 and 185 is too limited to enable significant development and would create significant addition vehicular traffic on existing minor roads to the detriment of existing residents.
see attached
Object
Strategic Growth Options
224 Hermes, Brook Lane, Doddinghurst
Representation ID: 4329
Received: 13/02/2015
Respondent: Doddinghurst Parish Council
Yes. The use of greenfield sites 143, 185, 070, 224, 188 and 019 (stated in original submission as 109 assumed incorrect and changed to 019) in Doddinghurst are unnacceptable as they require to, and open the door on, yet further development in the green belt. They also join up existing residential areas, creating urban sprawl in the village, and would change its character forever. Moreover the road access to sites143, 224, 070 and 185 is too limited to enable significant development and would create significant addition vehicular traffic on existing minor roads to the detriment of existing residents.
see attached