Comment

Representation ID: 5229

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Ursuline Sisters

Agent: JTS Partnership LLP

No comment

Support

Representation ID: 5230

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Ursuline Sisters

Agent: JTS Partnership LLP

All land should be considered, even small parcels which do not contribute to public amenity, such as land owned by the Ursuline Sisters at The Chase, Brentwood [LDP site ref: 154].

Comment

Representation ID: 13041

Received: 17/02/2015

Respondent: Ursuline Sisters

Agent: JTS Partnership LLP

Main issues have been considered, however, there are other important considerations for existing greenfield sites and maximising community infrastructure. Support Green Infrastructure concept, however, not all should be protected and enhanced. Existing Green Infrastructure must be considered critically to determine land function or whether it could be better used for housing (document suggests all Green Infrastructure be retained). However, we support additional provision with new development where opportunities arise. All land should be considered, even small parcels which do not contribute to public amenity, such as land owned by the Ursuline Sisters at The Chase, Brentwood [LDP site ref: 154].