Strategic Growth Options
Search representations
Results for One Property Group Ltd search
New searchComment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 5
Representation ID: 12642
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
Plan should assess and include Green Belt sites identified as suitable, available and achievable within the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA).
Brentwood, including the extended areas of Shenfield, Hutton, Ingrave etc is where most jobs and services are located within the Borough, and therefore where growth should be concentrated in accordance with the sustainability objectives of the NPPF.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
1.13 Evidence
Representation ID: 12662
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
The assessment of objectively assessed housing needs (OAN) appeared on the Council's website on 13 February, three working days before the consultation deadline. National Policy and Guidance requires a Local Plan be informed by robust and up to date evidence. It is disappointing that with the exception of the SHMA update the rest remain unavailable, the consultation document stating that they are 'forthcoming'. Although OAN evidence is listed within the document as December 2014, it does not yet appear on the Council's website.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 1
Representation ID: 12666
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
North of Borough: Agree villages should grow to provide local need. Given identified constraints, needs should be met by small scale exception sites in villages with services such as public transport, school and shops. These settlements should be identified in the Plan, but strategy should not rely on these as source of housing provision.
A12 Corridor: Apart from comment on A12 access to Brentwood, there is no assessment of accessibility and service range of Brentwood urban area. Important to note that Brentwood is where most jobs and services are and therefore where growth should be concentrated in accordance with NPPF.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 2
Representation ID: 12667
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
North of Borough: Agree villages should grow to provide local need. Given identified constraints, needs should be met by small scale exception sites in villages with services such as public transport, school and shops. These settlements should be identified in the Plan, but strategy should not rely on these as source of housing provision.
A12 Corridor: Apart from comment on A12 access to Brentwood, there is no assessment of accessibility and service range of Brentwood urban area. Important to note that Brentwood is where most jobs and services are and therefore where growth should be concentrated in accordance with NPPF.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Question 6
Representation ID: 12668
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
Agree villages should grow to provide local need. Given identified constraints, needs should be met by small scale exception sites in villages with services such as public transport, school and shops. These settlements should be identified in the Plan, but strategy should not rely on these as source of housing provision.
See attached.
Support
Strategic Growth Options
067A Salmonds Farm, Salmonds Grove, Ingrave
Representation ID: 12694
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
SHLAA recognised that land at Salmonds Grove [site ref 067A] is suitable, available and achievable and could deliver 44 dwellings within years 1-5. Site has good connection with the village and transport links.
Site is available for residential development and achievable albeit constrained by recommendation that only western part of site [067A] is developed (approx. 30% of total site). Proposed layout plan is attached.
Council has deficient five year housing land supply. It is important to balance strategic allocations with smaller sites with few constraints that can be delivered quickly, such as land at Salmonds Grove [067A].
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
067B Salmonds Farm, Salmonds Grove, Ingrave
Representation ID: 12695
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
Attached representation shows that only part of wider site proposed to be developed, i.e. 067A developed but not 067B. This is consistent with conclusions of Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA).
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
1.13 Evidence
Representation ID: 12696
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
The current strategy of the Plan will not meet projected affordable housing needs in the Borough.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
1.13 Evidence
Representation ID: 12698
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
Concern that Crossrail Economic Impacts and Highways Modelling evidence are forthcoming, which discords with the NPPF. Many evidence documents currently unavailable. Not clear whether comprehensive site assessment undertaken. Landscape Sensitivity Testing and Green Belt Assessment essential when identifying new Green Belt sites. Query whether missing evidence prepared in advance of Local Plan or retrospectively to accord with Council strategy. No consideration of Green Belt sites individual and cumulative effects. On basis of information available, it seems decision made preventing Green Belt release for employment and residential around Brentwood and Shenfield, the Borough's primary urban areas.
See attached.
Comment
Strategic Growth Options
Life of the Plan
Representation ID: 12699
Received: 17/02/2015
Respondent: One Property Group Ltd
Agent: Phase 2 Planning and Development Ltd
Plan needs to take account of shortfalls since NPPF published, and have at least 15 years life from adoption. Plan proposed to run until 2030 but not projected to be adopted until 2017, giving only a life of 13 years. Given the Council is required to review Green Belt boundaries and define boundaries that endure, a longer period should be proposed to provide certainty given that larger sites may deliver beyond 2030. Suggest 2035 as end date.
See attached.