Comment

Representation ID: 12715

Received: 28/04/2015

Respondent: Persimmon Homes Essex

The extension to [West] Horndon provides a good opportunity to use Previously Developed Land in an area, well served by rail and the strategic road network. Both large strategic sites in the A127 corridor will undoubtedly require some infrastructure improvements and given the potential size of these sites it is unlikely that houses would be delivered within the first 5 years of the plan. The Council could seek to help improve delivery of these sites by engaging in discussions with Developers early or ensure that elements such as Design Codes are not required which could ultimately delay the start on site by months or even years.

Comment

Representation ID: 12716

Received: 28/04/2015

Respondent: Persimmon Homes Essex

It is felt that the Dunton extension may require more infrastructure improvements than that at West Horndon given the quantum of development currently being discussed between the Brentwood and Basildon Authority areas. If Dunton were to be allocated it is likely delivery will be seen in the Basildon Authority first with the latter phases within the Brentwood boundary. Given this likely phasing Brentwood should consider whether Dunton should be allocated in addition to West Horndon, albeit on the premise that the plan period, is extended past the minimum period of 15 years to ensure the delivery of these homes is well planned.

Comment

Representation ID: 12717

Received: 28/04/2015

Respondent: Persimmon Homes Essex

With CrossRail due to open in the near future the potential for significant investment should be taken to ensure further infrastructure improvements are delivered. It is openly acknowledged by the Highways Agency that the M25 Junction 28, Brook Street roundabout, is already over capacity and therefore the impact of development on this route should be carefully considered.

If improvements are required to this key junction, as well as perhaps upgrades to the wider strategic road network, the Council should consider whether there is a quantum of development needed in Borough to help fund upgrades to key junctions and the wider road network, through S106 contributions or CIL.Early discussiong witht eh Highways Agency are advised. It may be that by extending the plan period past the minimum of 15 years may help the Council unlock more long term funding.

Comment

Representation ID: 12718

Received: 28/04/2015

Respondent: Persimmon Homes Essex

By allocating sites on the edge of urban areas the highway impact is likely to be minimised as the sites will ultimately be more sustainable. The enhancement of pedestrian and cycle connections should also be considered, and whether there is any scope for improving connectivity to the rail stations. In addition the provision of further employment sites within the Borough will not only reduce the potential for out-commuting but bring in further investment into the area. The growth in the A12 corridor provides opportunities for development utilising the strategic highway network as a defensible boundary to prevent urban sprawl and the coalescence of settlements.

Comment

Representation ID: 12719

Received: 28/04/2015

Respondent: Persimmon Homes Essex

To meet OAN, Brentwood need to ensure that a range of different sites are allocated. With a large percentage of Green Belt within the Authority, therefore significant numbers are only likely to be realised through this release; however the NPPF supports the early release of Brownfield land. It should be acknowledged that Brownfield release will have higher remediation costs. Early discussions with Developer Interests will ensure that any emerging policy is sound by not rendering a site unviable through contributions that cannot be sustained. This will help the Borough demonstrate the soundness of their allocation sites and policies when examined in front of an Inspector.