Support

Representation ID: 29867

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Land North of Shenfield Developer Group

Number of people: 4

Agent: Barton Willmore

The Developer Group supports the additional text at part D of MG05. This text puts the IDP within a formal Local Plan policy, which is welcomed.
The text recognises that some infrastructure, such as a primary school and early years and childcare nursery, may need to be forward funded before all allocations that are required to contribute towards it have been built and able to pay the requisite contribution.

Support

Representation ID: 29868

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Land North of Shenfield Developer Group

Number of people: 4

Agent: Barton Willmore

The Developer Group supports the additional text inserted into policy allocations R04 to R19 referencing the infrastructure requirements in accordance with MG05.

Object

Representation ID: 29869

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Land North of Shenfield Developer Group

Number of people: 4

Agent: Barton Willmore

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Concerns that there is a risk of development being delayed on the basis of transport improvements being determined only at the point of reviewing the Local Plan.

Object

Representation ID: 29870

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Land North of Shenfield Developer Group

Number of people: 4

Agent: Barton Willmore

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

Concerned that the proposed policy has just delayed the policy considerations and not necessarily dealt with National Highways actual concerns about the M25 junctions. It is assumed that BBC reached an agreement with National Highways and the Local Plan examination Inspectors on the wording of MG06, and the consequent delay in consideration of the M25 junction issues. The Developer group seeks assurance that this agreement with National Highways will still hold whilst the planning applications for Land north of Shenfield are being considered and will not therefore, attract an objection by National Highways on the grounds that this matter has not been resolved at this stage.

Support

Representation ID: 29871

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Land North of Shenfield Developer Group

Number of people: 4

Agent: Barton Willmore

Revised policy acknowledges that the requirement for a minimum of 10% of predicted energy needs of a development to be from renewable energy may not be possible or appropriate on site, and therefore allows for flexibility to be provided off site or funded through a s106. The Developer Group supports this approach

Object

Representation ID: 29872

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Land North of Shenfield Developer Group

Number of people: 4

Agent: Barton Willmore

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

As currently drafted, a developer (of a scheme over 500 homes) is forced to consider a decentralised system before any other alternatives. It does not allow a developer to demonstrate that alternative solutions could deliver the overall aim of the policy. Object to the wording of B(ii and iii) which should be rewritten to to allow a developer to demonstrate that an appropriate strategy has been included in the development.
Policy places the burden of proof on the developer when it is right for the Council to have first demonstrated the deliverability of such technology.

Object

Representation ID: 29873

Received: 25/11/2021

Respondent: Land North of Shenfield Developer Group

Number of people: 4

Agent: Barton Willmore

Legally compliant? Not specified

Sound? No

In regard to self build, Policy HP01 now includes a caveat regarding the need for the provision to be demonstrated. This provision is absent from Policy R03, and should be included for consistency.